50mm 1.2 on FF surely
Go away spammer !

1.2G is something I want if really there.
Nearreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeer

with FP, can go up 1/4000

The new higher range lens are all N lens. ;-) This is pretty much how Nikon differentiate their higher range versus their normal lens I guess. Like how Canon label their L.
Fast sync. With that you can shoot up to 1/4000 (D90). I think 1/8000 on higher end bodies.

FP need to be on it from menu !

i got some question~~if i have a chance to get a 2nd hand D200 or D80, shud i get them instead of D3100?thanks in advance...XD~~

and now i dont know who to listen...

Ha.. Thanks for the info.. My friend is coming back to Melb soon.. Hope there are still stock with the shop he bought it from...

EDIT: my friend said that the blur mostly happen when using 50mm f1.8 lens he got and seldom happen on the 18-105mm kit... Does that means his camera is ok and its his skill problem? He also mentioned that when he bump his ISO up to 1600 and apperture up to f2.8 then blur not tat bad.. Is it equipment or skill problem here? (He mostly use AUTO ISO... Still new to DSLR)

cik_tak, for a kit lens with that price I would rate it very good. I've used canon's 18-55mm and I feel nikon's 18-55 is better. And please don't go compare a 1.9k tamron 1750 with nikon 1855VR, it's not fair.
You pay what you get, I didn't say 18-55 is better than 18-70 or the expensive 16-85, but 18-55 is not something so bad that we would call it CRAP. Crap = USELESS, no value at all.
I've captured lots of photos using the 18-55 NON VR before, and it's not crap either.

The lens quality not as good as 1870.. If u wanna cheap lens u better go for 50mm 1.8 .. The focusing grip not as good as 1870 ... Color not gud enuf .. Low light even worse .. And 1 more y u need VR on 1855 .. R ur hand shaking .. Damn weird

Pointless argue with you. You just don't get it.

1st time I see watermark on the hair of the bride 

Expensive lens are to make your life easier, if taking photos gives you 3 meals a day.

That's after you mastering all the metering, lighting bla bla bla..

Ok people. Push the limit of your kitlens first. Learn what you need to learn. Poison is a normal thing, it makes people closer each other.

Oh my. That ladies smile

The teeth

18-55 isn't CRAP, the person call it, is !
Comparing 300bucks kit lens with 18-70 which retail at 1.1k ?
Pointless comparison.

I'd do the same. But maybe another angle ?

That is the 28-70 f/2.8 AF-S lo. Older than that is 35-70 f/2.8 AF
Current version is 24-70 f/2.8G.

There is only one 28-70/2.8 and in two colours in Japan. I used to own one, in black, till about 5 years ago. Its a fine sharp lens, but too heavy, expensive and large for its limited zoom range. The afs is as fast as today's 24-70, but it feels like a fat hog. I'd prefer the new 24-120/4 for the added range and vr over the 1 stop larger aperture.