The Official Nikon Discussion thread V1, All under one roof !
|
|
 Nov 29 2010, 08:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
 
Junior Member
208 posts Joined: Feb 2008 
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 29 2010, 07:56 PM) Today is POISON day holy molly...!!  » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «   did you test it out...?This post has been edited by chobo: Nov 29 2010, 08:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 08:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
|
Junior Member
208 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Nov 29 2010, 08:29 PM) I am using d3100. these guys made video with DSLR.... and the outcome is pretty good... i'm amazed...I saw some youtube video produce a good quality even it's made from DSLR only. so I wish I can get some recording technique. hehehe http://carrotoranges.com/ |
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 08:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
|
Junior Member
208 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
QUOTE(gnome @ Nov 29 2010, 08:36 PM) Pic spam very big eyes.... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « One of my college classmates  |
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 11:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
|
Junior Member
208 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 30 2010, 02:29 AM) IIRC, not in the list and 18-200 on D700 ? i saw once.... d700 with 18-55... i'm surprised... that's something you dont see every year...I will ROFL and LMAO ! Idiot fellow will do that. DX on FF might as well don't buy 18-55 is not bad... but it's just weird on FX... This post has been edited by chobo: Nov 30 2010, 11:36 AM |
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 04:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
|
Junior Member
208 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 30 2010, 04:15 PM) 17-55 got VR? no VR...Added on November 30, 2010, 4:19 pm QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Nov 30 2010, 04:01 PM) izit better take 24-70 f2.8 den 17-55 f2.8...? VR is good... but can only help you in certain situation... it cant save you when the object is moving fast... unless you boost up your iso...as i think vr is quite important... i dun hav steady hand... nid to ikat perut for few months adi... This post has been edited by chobo: Nov 30 2010, 04:19 PM |
|
|
Nov 30 2010, 10:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
|
Junior Member
208 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
QUOTE(yushin @ Nov 30 2010, 07:59 PM) I was using 18-200 on D700 before 28-300 come out. why not 24-120 VR1..? already exist back then and some countries sell it in package as the kit lens of d700... it's cheaper than 18-200.. but then again so so performance...Ya, people give me that weird look too when they saw 18-200 on a D700. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2010, 05:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
|
Junior Member
208 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
QUOTE(illegaldragon87 @ Dec 1 2010, 05:24 PM) hahah... guess i should spam group photo instead... nice shot.... but only flaw is everyone's legs became Godzilla's leg... since everyone is pic of gals... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by chobo: Dec 1 2010, 05:36 PM |
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 12:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
|
Junior Member
208 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
QUOTE(daze @ Dec 2 2010, 12:24 PM) 50mm color are nicest but i found 50mm handle flare quite bad... not sure if i share this here b4. just spam anyway » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « shouldnt be complaining anyhow..... the lens is cheap and good enough... Added on December 3, 2010, 12:03 pm QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Dec 2 2010, 03:21 PM) Instead of looks goldey, the ring looks yellow yes... if you realized... the gold ring on some of the pro lens is not standardize... and the new 24... 35... 85mm is really gold compared to others... maybe they did some changers on some of the new lens... This post has been edited by chobo: Dec 3 2010, 12:03 PM |
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 12:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
|
Junior Member
208 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Dec 3 2010, 04:48 AM) Guys, just a random question. If you have RM8k budget for lenses to cover wedding, what would it be? for me... 24-70 is a good range on DX body when it comes to wedding shots... havent try it on FX though...24-70 & 85 1.8? 14-24 & 85 1.8? 11-16 & 70-200? Other choices?  70-200 too far man... can be worst on DX... |
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
|
Junior Member
208 posts Joined: Feb 2008
|
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Dec 3 2010, 02:01 PM) Is it wide enough though? Can 70mm f2.8 on 24-70 produce nice bokeh? it's bout 36-105 on DX... you judge loh... different ppl different pov...yes it can... as long as the subject is close... This post has been edited by chobo: Dec 3 2010, 02:14 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0379sec
 0.28
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 04:29 AM |
Quote
