About the 125WHP from 155hp of the Lancer 2L Civic is correct I witness it
Same for the Lancer as well....around 114-116WHP stock

Yeah lah, Gouki was mentioning about that way earlier also so I just confirm it la

This post has been edited by shinjite: Nov 18 2010, 07:19 PM

Both cars also don't have
For Mitsubishi is all the bigger turbo brothers

300km/h is crazy

The french wife's engine even underwent boob job, lypo and many more man for the Proton S2000 rally

This post has been edited by shinjite: Nov 19 2010, 11:33 PM

Forte's 4 speed auto eats up 23% (124PS at crank)
Where else the Jazz's CVT eats up only 19% (110PS at crank)

This post has been edited by shinjite: Nov 29 2010, 02:29 AM

Base on the chart on all 4 cars (including the Jazz 1.5 CVT)

Best to the least efficiency transmission (power loss)
1) Jazz CVT (19.2%)
2) Vios (19.3%)
3) Satria Neo (20%)
4) Forte (22.5%)

Old Campros, the power comes in at 4000rpm mah hence the boost

The Inspira has better acceleration off the line as well due to its 6 speed transmission
Both the 2L engine power is the same

Dude....the Inspira has a Sports Mode with 6 preset gear ratios for manual driving man

Are you shooting yourself in the foot with that claim?

1.8 with CVT also has 6 spd 'manual' in Sports Mode

C.Ronaldo owns a 599, not an Enzo

They already have the EVO Xs, I bet more Inspiras will replace the old running Wajas indefinitely on the road

It is suppose to feel like that

1.8 Inspira is not conventional auto, it is also CVT with 6 speed sports mode (INVECS III) but without paddle shifters only

They state wrongly for the CVT section only as both the 1.8 and 2.0 has CVT
For the paddle shifters, it is correct as only the 2.0L Premium model only has it. The 1.8 Executive version doesn't have paddle shifters

So you don't need to be confuse

Don't lah cucuk until like that, me Wira owner feel sakit leh

1) Rims is not much of a big factor, it is the auto slushbox that is the main culprit as well as the lower displacement. Well if you compare nicely, power to weight ratio with a CVT 1.8 Inspira, The Forte still has better power to weight ratio, the CVT Inspira might have avg 8-10whp more but it can be easily canceled out due to its sheer weight but why still lose, blame the slushbox.

2) What kcng was refering to is the real world performance (doesn't need to be the B series, 4AGE or SR16DE), not on paper and definitely not regarding the engine's fuel consumption. Newer engines with newer technology of course will be more fuel economical. If you wanna compare FC, go take the old 13B rotary and cry

This post has been edited by shinjite: Sep 7 2011, 08:53 AM

The Forte should be around 1.2 tonnes IIANM
The Inspira is around the 1.3tonne range

This post has been edited by shinjite: Sep 7 2011, 09:13 AM