mazda3 2.0 performance not comparable to inspira or forte 2.0?

lol if u are a millionaire u wouldnt even look at a mazda.. lol.. at least an Audi, BMW, or merc haha

---

Added on November 18, 2010, 11:24 pm

forte pawn lancer in staright line..their CVT slows their acceleration..donno la whats wrong with their CVT..
tested a few times with another stock LGT.. but FD2 pawns all... at 180-200 all about on par..

1. Q:Why ppl said Inspira is improved Lancer? A:Coz Inspira using 15'' Rim, and Lancer using 18'' Rim, sure Inspira more comfortable, but lack of stability and grip. Improved CVT gearbox, and with more better tuned Handling. That's the reason behind of 'Improved Lancer'. But for what I seen, Lancer in term of QA still better than Inspira ALOT!! My friend owns Lancer EX(Not GT - better version), also better than so called 'Improved Lancer'.
2. Q:Why u said Forte is no better than Lancer? A:I think you got it all wrong. Forte is much more better in QA and even compare with it's BODY!! My Forte kena accident, Front is juz slight damage. But hit is very hard(80km/h vehicle rushing, hitting my accelerating 30km/h speed) damage juz little, thanks to the strong chassis, or else my car will be like OMG!! Totalled!! Another 1 u can ask is Izputra, which uses 2.0 Forte...recently an P1 Iswara hit his Forte butt, surprisingly, P1 Iswara front is gone, can't move, can't start engine. Yet, his Forte butt is juz like nothing!!! Juz like need abit of paint job then back to original. Wanna complain?? If u wan prove :




That's Izputra's Forte butt and that P1 Iswara






That's mine Forte front

Prove ur Lancer and Inspira toughness....or better if u all wan 2 compare...these photos are real. Photoshots at NAZA KIA SC Alor Setar