Just bring all three

---

Added on November 26, 2010, 6:17 pmmost of the time,tiny dust in lens doesn't affect the image quality,don't bother it,just shoot

This post has been edited by iamKiet: Nov 26 2010, 06:17 PM

Photos of London:

So you wanna upgrade?

Congratz bro,remember to share some photos here,and don't forgot the review of A580

travelling

#1.

I think you start with vivid mode then you are good to go,the more you shoot,the more you understand & know your own preferences

Haha...so true...thanks viking for the lesson

Thanks albnok,will keep that in mind But the #5 I quite like it,don't mind about the fengshui

---

Added on November 29, 2010, 12:36 pmSo street price would be around RM7xx?

This post has been edited by iamKiet: Nov 29 2010, 12:36 PM

Itulah model kereta yg cantik

Go KLIMS 2010 lor

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=38234323

Should we?

I never bother,cause none of my business,I still love my camera,flash,lenses,the colour reproduction of Sony and most importantly the humble Sony Alpha crowds

Hmm...I not sure,but recently latest models that Sony offering seems promising in handling high ISO,reference link as below
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonyslta55/page16.asp
So I do see improvements in Sony

Don't be so pissed off,enjoy your world of photography,appreciate what you have currently

Never bother it at all

lol...I saw that too,funny

I have both the tamron 17-50 & 50f1.8,I can say they are on different league,don't think each can be replaced by another. But 50f1.8 is abit too tight in aps-c,if you wanna get a prime,I think it would be better to get the newly announced 35f1.8,which gives you view of around 50mm,I am going to get that too. For tamron 17-50,it is quite a decent lens for aps-c,but I don't think the sharpness at f2.8 is comparable with 50f1.8,the better sharpness for tamron should be above f4 Personally I prefer Sony/Minolta colour than Tamron's.

I am not sure about the street price,but it's retail at RM899,hopefully street price gets below 800. Yes,for better sharpness for the tamron,should stopped down to f4,but the sharpness is much better compared to kitlens@f4,I had kitlens before,the sweetspot I would say around 7.1~8,you figure it out but for beginner,I would recommend you to get flash(f42) instead of changing lens since you still do not understand what kind of photography you prefer. By comparing SAL50f1.8 with tamron 17-50f2.8,the Sony gives me more contrast and vivid colours. If you are going to shoot for your friend's wedding,definitely a flash would be much appropriate,because most of the time the wedding hall do not give you sufficient lighting even you are shooting at f2.8 all the time,you gonna pump up the iso and get some grainy photos sometimes

I think master albnok mentioned that he prefers the 50f1.8 bokeh too
(The 16-35f2.8 would be muuccccccccccch more expensive than my camera body )

In that case,the flash would serve you well enough with your kitlens,kitlens can get decent photos with proper lighting. Get the f58 if possible,for the higher flash power and the swivel head.Hmm...I think Sony going to announce a f42 replacement (perhaps) which comes with swivel head too,I am eyeing it and gonna grab it quickly once it's out,sometimes f58 is just abit too big bringing around.

I think f42 can be triggered by popup flash

another form of poison =.="

You mean Sony built like rock?

+1

This is really......speechless......

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=38404911