QUOTE(shukrie @ Dec 3 2010, 12:21 PM)
i also got i also got...
This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 3 2010, 02:39 PM
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V48!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 02:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 05:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
QUOTE(albnok @ Dec 3 2010, 05:35 PM) lwliam: Could be a bit more to the right to get symmetry. The 85mm F2.8 is good! Am just a bit too busy to post anything now. |
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 06:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
gouki, bring me for a spin in your ride
|
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 09:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 09:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 09:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Dec 3 2010, 09:53 PM) a hahaha, my answer's not that long... it'll be, coz i have no other choice as jumping ship involves selling your kidney to support the finance.. and i love my kidneys the way they are now Actually, ive always wanted to ask (if i havent already asked), why each of you guys here chose Alpha? for me, it was because my friend (who upgraded to a d300) used to have the a200... so normal peer influence kicked in. Then when i got to know the DSLR community, Sony's thread here is 90% of the time very friendly and helpful (not to say others arent). And also, the fact that quite a number of people put down sony makes me want to prove them wrong. and i like to be part of something growing. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 10:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 11:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
QUOTE(achew @ Dec 3 2010, 10:33 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « tried ..but failed to show the awesomeness in this place with my shot.. This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 3 2010, 11:02 PM |
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 11:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
QUOTE(achew @ Dec 3 2010, 11:14 PM) something like this u mean ok, the earlier shot was wayyyyy better then, with the movements and all... guess u cant do much in a crowded place huh.. too much variables» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « cant really use tripod for this shot..so no motion blur..lol..it was simply too crowded there...tripods are forbidden to use....for the earlier shot..i did use tripod..that was when the guard turn around to look at somewhere else for few sec...lol |
|
|
Dec 4 2010, 12:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
QUOTE(shootkk @ Dec 3 2010, 11:58 PM) Wokeh! I upgraded My A850 from firmware V1 to V2. i'd dare say that they did improve a bit on the noise handling as well. The chroma noise does seem more suppressed in the V2. Even the grains seems less course, though in-camera sharpness does seem to take half a step back, but thats the trade-off for having a higher noise removal algorithm i presume. but viewed at normal size, there ain't much issue to be nitpicked with, not unless you really go right into 100% view. But with 24MPs to start with, normal prints will not give any issue anyway even with V1I shot a couple of ISO3200 shots to see if there are any difference. Turns out the results are inconclusive. I did see a little improvement but I can't say that it means anything. Here are the shots: V1 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « You be the judge. |
|
|
Dec 4 2010, 11:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
alrighty then, i've not much to share... but oh well...
![]() ![]() This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 5 2010, 12:08 AM |
|
|
Dec 5 2010, 01:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
she smile for me at least
people stand there so many hours d, sure tired la... can't blame them and i feel cheated for the batmobil.. i go to KLIM only JUST FOR it.. dissapointed.. RM20 down the drain.. useless... ![]() Added on December 5, 2010, 1:13 amzstan, apa ini????? hand shake and underexposure? macam ini pun boleh tunjuk orang punya ka? This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 5 2010, 01:13 AM |
|
|
Dec 5 2010, 05:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
e-jump.. Stunning!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 8 2010, 02:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
![]() » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Added on December 8, 2010, 2:40 am QUOTE(hazril @ Dec 7 2010, 11:20 PM) midrange VS entry level...can ka like dat?might as well compare FF with sony cybershot...betul2 holiau...!! mee sedap... betul2 holiau +1111QUOTE(chiahau @ Dec 8 2010, 12:56 AM) Should i jack up the white balance then? It was kinda a random shot coz I was already walking away from the place. tweaking white balance does not alter the image's exposure value. from the image, it seems a little dull, perhaps add a bit of compensation? +2/3 could be enough to do the trick, coz the bright sky fooled the camera metering into thinking it needs to underexpose the shot to 'correctly' compensate, so yourself should add in a couple of notches back to re-compensate for the compensation This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 8 2010, 02:40 AM |
|
|
Dec 8 2010, 07:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
newbie, we knew about it already.. those of us who is working, how u expect to go on weekdays?
|
|
|
Dec 8 2010, 10:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
i still have my student ID which is still valid, coz no expiry date
|
|
|
Dec 10 2010, 11:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
QUOTE(zstan @ Dec 10 2010, 11:28 AM) not really. canon means canon la, apasal nonac la, nicknack la, tictac la... the new nonac 70-200 f2.8 IS II cost about twice the one without IS, and almost 1.5 times more expensive than our 70-200G. does it mean its much much more superiorly optically better than its predecessor or our sony lens? image stabilization is a technology which costs an arm an a leg, especially when the fact is that they DO work.. considering the size, which is similar to that from 70-200G, WITH IS in the lens, i say that is a pretty well miniaturization of some pretty nifty stuff there. some canon users might use the fact that canon L lenses openly say that their lenses are weather sealed, and myself would take that as a pretty good assurance to use it in the toughest condition mother nature can throw at me without a flinch.. would i do the same with SAL 70-200G? not that i say it cant, we have users who have tried and tested it out on the open dessert, rallies etc... but i'd do that with my own lens with a pinch of salt. their IS consists of different modes of IS, where when used in different scenarios, does give a better advantage over those who doesn't have the option to choose. its all about the details, not only optics are solely taken into consideration. |
|
|
Dec 11 2010, 10:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
for strobing, f42 also enough d..
Added on December 11, 2010, 10:47 amthanatos, finally upgraded? Congratz This post has been edited by lwliam: Dec 11 2010, 10:47 AM |
|
|
Dec 12 2010, 05:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
Sifu Signither and Sifu Cjlai
|
|
|
Dec 12 2010, 06:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
mini sifus win consolation
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0249sec
0.38
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 07:40 PM |