Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Implementation Of A Maximum LTV of 70%, for 3rd properties and beyond only...
|
midnightraven
|
Nov 4 2010, 08:00 PM
|
New Member
|
i guess those not so rich ones now will target cheaper house prices now?
so high end property price drop, lower/medium end property price increase cos the not-so-big guns will play at a lower price range now.
there's no rule that say people that earn a lot of money cannot buy <350k house, right? so now 1 bubble is deflated and another 1 will be created elsewhere.
RPGT should have been an easier solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
midnightraven
|
Nov 5 2010, 04:07 PM
|
New Member
|
the cap of 70% could be counter productive to properties around the 350k
10% dp of 1mil house = 100k 30% dp of 1mil house = 300k 30% dp of 350k house = 105k
so if a person have around 100-110k cash in pocket and looking to buy a 3rd house, instead of not buying.. he/she will just buy a cheaper house. this move is just shifting the bubble. the high end market will definitely be affected. not everyone that buy 1 mil property may not be 1st or 2nd time house buyer and may not be cash rich, so a price correction might happen for high end property.
this move could potentially be counter productive and may defeat the original purpose. the solution is not as simple as introducing a LTV ratio of 70% cap. a realisticc price evaluation on a new development may be more realistic to equal the playing ground between new and subsale financing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
midnightraven
|
Nov 6 2010, 08:32 PM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Pai @ Nov 6 2010, 08:16 PM) somehow I think this cap wont last more than 24 months.......  it will last till after the next GE at least
|
|
|
|
|