Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Implementation Of A Maximum LTV of 70%, for 3rd properties and beyond only...

views
     
mageP23
post Nov 4 2010, 02:08 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(Xai-V-iaX @ Nov 4 2010, 01:57 AM)
Yes, but I'm trying to put myself in the shoes of an moderate earner who is slogging to meet then ends in daily life and how will they worry on getting a roof over their head with the current property prices???  cry.gif

If that young guy can afford to hold on to TWO properties - I feel going for an THIRD is on personal choice and doesn't require an interference or consideration from the Government or any agencies. My concern will will be on the FIRST purchaser for that group are the MOST affected from the Property Price Hike.
*
Does that mean if you sell off your any of your 1st two properties, then you wouldn't be bounded by the LTV 70% cap?

Anyone in the know?

This post has been edited by mageP23: Nov 4 2010, 02:09 AM
mageP23
post Nov 4 2010, 08:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(zetkramer @ Nov 4 2010, 05:39 AM)
I am thinking about that too, is like having the cheaper property sell off and look for the LTV 90% for more expensive property...But from the statement, is should be this way though..

Need someone to confirm it  hmm.gif
*
I think it's depending on the number of properties you bought, if the intention of BNM is to curb over-speculation. smile.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0213sec    0.62    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 01:33 PM