Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Implementation Of A Maximum LTV of 70%, for 3rd properties and beyond only...

views
     
Iceman74
post Nov 3 2010, 11:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,407 posts

Joined: May 2010


QUOTE(jalsrix @ Nov 3 2010, 10:58 PM)
The govt has already given sufficient warning during past 1 to 2 months. So no surprise here.  laugh.gif

Only today it is confirmed. They should have confirmed during budget day. mad.gif

Wait for another surprise ie. increase in RPGT.
*
actually the RPGT are in place, just timing not right now
with GST also in the pipeline, dun play play shakehead.gif
Iceman74
post Nov 4 2010, 02:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,407 posts

Joined: May 2010


QUOTE(yfo @ Nov 4 2010, 02:18 PM)
can't they just sell off the 1st house and upgrade? hmm.gif
*
if really for own staying, it is always advice settled the loan ASAP
why not just settled the loan since it small apartment/loan & buy the dream house with 90% loan lor doh.gif
unless already cannot afford in the first place hmm.gif
Iceman74
post Nov 5 2010, 01:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,407 posts

Joined: May 2010


actually the Developers kena kaw kaw this time, those build expensive condo will suffer more
now Developers need to think, build more affordable house/condo for 1st/2nd owners or luxury condo for cash rich investors

btw why got so many high income property investors but goven income still the same. brows.gif
Next stop, gov will have their hand on those property investors undeclared income. tongue.gif
with RPGT & GST high on their list moving forward.

This post has been edited by Iceman74: Nov 5 2010, 01:50 PM
Iceman74
post Dec 14 2010, 08:47 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,407 posts

Joined: May 2010


QUOTE(cherroy @ Dec 13 2010, 12:26 AM)
Both of your posts highlight another issue on the properties.

Actually, the economy and RE market do not scare the ultra-rich to own 10 properties or speculator the properties using their own money.
If ultra-rich can buy 100 houses with cash, then let be it. It won't cause any systemic catastrophere effect even property market plunge.

The RE and economy most fear is people using leverage to "play" the properties market, which buyers do not have those kind of money in the first place, or not able to sustain from their own financial situation.
The ultimate evil is the leverage + speculative.

Speculative alone won't cause too much problem afterwards even market collapse.
It is the leverage part that can kill.

2008 financial crisis resulted from RE bubble bursting is all about leverage.

Ultra-rich can hold for years on those vacant house for years, it doesn't matter for them.
Why fire-sales the properties that bought 1 mil and sell it for 500k?
Might as well keep it like into freeze, after all, they are ultra-rich, doesn't urgent need the 500K, what if hold 10 years later on, it become 2 mil, by then only sell also not too late.
*
at last got someone know the danger of power of leverage rclxms.gif
but sadly got alot ppl still think i in positive cashflow from all the properties i have, so nothing can happen to me
let say if RE & rental adjustment down 10%, which one should sell first
the low rental income yield properties which normally located in not so good location(maybe need to sell at a lost), or
high rental income yield properties which you lose out the appreciation in future
both also can considered bad decision but if not cutting lost now, will investors able to top up those difference for years to come



This post has been edited by Iceman74: Dec 14 2010, 09:00 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0204sec    1.17    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 02:07 PM