Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D3100/D5000 V12, Future Dark Lords
|
|
 Nov 1 2010, 06:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...  
|
long time haven't share too....
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2010, 07:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
i saw in shashinki di622 is already discontinued after the release of di622 mark ii. So bad... Just planning to buy this month. Hopefully can get it. If not have to fetch mark ii...
What's the difference between the old and mark ii?? |
|
|
Nov 6 2010, 09:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
QUOTE(takumitan89 @ Nov 6 2010, 07:24 PM) may i ask did nikon D3100 suitable for beginner user for DSLR??? very suitable indeed... it's awesome... i regret buying my D3000 coz if i wait another month, i would get D3100 instead...   |
|
|
Nov 6 2010, 10:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Nov 6 2010, 10:10 PM) price similar to MarkI iinm slightly expensive... around additional RM100 on shashinki iinm...maybe slightly abit more expensive makes me thinking, wait and save some more and get mkII or just get the old one...  |
|
|
Nov 6 2010, 10:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
QUOTE(fabianz03 @ Nov 6 2010, 10:48 PM) Of course get the new one ! i'll get the 1999 if i dont have to wait to save some more and i need a car badly...If you were to buy a car, say Waja. Will you buy the 1999 version or just add RM2,500 to buy the 2005 version ?  but that will make me thinking, will 2005 version worth the wait... ahhhh... i guess i dont have to shoot an event indoor at the moment, so maybe just wait...  using built-in flash for that purpose isn't that nice... though what my built in flash did in last shooting amazed me  |
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 09:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
QUOTE(radi0head @ Nov 8 2010, 09:18 PM) guys... actually ar... do u all alwiz use the flash? i used my pop-up flash for these occassion:-i don use flash most of the time tho... i don see the needs for it... unless it's quite dim and dark which i need bright shot but eventho that, i wud still preferred original lighting of it being dark... i saw alot uses external flash lagi where the built flash oledi too bright as i see it... or potraits are better wif flash? i dono... or izzit just me... just wanna see how many of u really uses flash on most of ur shots...  1. it's too dark and not necessary to preserve the original lighting/color 2. filling up shadows 3. freezing movements |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
Pic spam~~~
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 11:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
QUOTE(fabianz03 @ Nov 9 2010, 10:52 PM) 2nd pic is click on the photo and it'll open my photostream... check exif from there... EXIF ? anyway, exposure 1/25sec f/5.3 48mm focal ISO100 and it's kit lens  This post has been edited by mrl: Nov 9 2010, 11:03 PM |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 11:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
QUOTE(fabianz03 @ Nov 9 2010, 11:16 PM) Who says kit lens can't produce nice images ? hehe... after i've been whacked by sand coated pictures at ISO800, dont dare to go over ISO200 anymore... even in dark, i'll stick with ISO200 the most... ISO100, no wonder so clean. |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 11:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
pretty bright to my eyes... it's I-City... lights are everywhere...
though if i'm not mistaken that picture is taken with manual focus coz the lens can't focus on it's own... |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
QUOTE(fabianz03 @ Nov 9 2010, 11:33 PM) I see, I wanna try out ISO-100 in low light too. maybe you wanna prepare a tripod... The best thing is, ON A D3000 !   |
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 06:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
QUOTE(fabianz03 @ Nov 10 2010, 06:34 PM) D-Lightning can cause high noise ? i didn't know it too... though if it's true, i guess that's the answer to why some of my pic even at ISO100 is noisy... Didn't know that. |
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 09:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
like this, i got to try to disable d-lighting and shoot again... really interesting...
|
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 10:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
977 posts Joined: Jan 2009 From: In the middle...
|
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Nov 10 2010, 09:10 PM) Can u help me rmbr d term/name 1st? u mean bracketing???D ability of camera to capture high difference in exposure? Where current camera tech nt so high n nid hdr to compensate? @fabianz, yeah... i guess it's true then... D-Lighting throws out some noise... all this while i thought Adobe Camera Raw creating the noise when converting to JPEG... |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0183sec
 0.54
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 11:22 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.