Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D3100/D5000 V12, Future Dark Lords
|
fabianz03
|
 Nov 15 2010, 08:18 PM
|
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 15 2010, 08:04 PM) Believe or not even ISO good, I sometime dine at hotel, aperture still at f/1.4  Never mess with hotel lighting, especially fine dining. of course 35mm better than 18-55 in taking portrait. Prime lens bokeh always better  Really ? LOL Usually f/1.4 with what ISO ? This post has been edited by fabianz03: Nov 15 2010, 08:22 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
fabianz03
|
Nov 15 2010, 10:04 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(BenSow @ Nov 15 2010, 09:59 PM) hahaha digitalrev.. Kai rocks  Guys what is DX and FX? And what is the cheapest macro lens good for D3100? ohh... Also how to check prices of DSLRs sold by retailers in singapore? Nikon sells more expensive than retailers right? DX - crop sensor FX - Full frame. |
|
|
|
|
|
fabianz03
|
Nov 16 2010, 11:31 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(BenSow @ Nov 15 2010, 10:38 PM) LOL those 2 I saw.. he funny la haha... painted the D90 pink
Added on November 15, 2010, 10:51 pmHow far can macro lenses zoom? I scared sometimes I wanna shoot landscape that nid zoom... Get a standard zoom lens la. 18-xxx if you wanna zoom + lanscape or else swap lens lo, lanscape - 18-55, macro - sp90 |
|
|
|
|
|
fabianz03
|
Nov 16 2010, 02:51 PM
|
|
|
It's Inspira !  Test drive unit !  |
|
|
|
|
|
fabianz03
|
Nov 17 2010, 12:16 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(BenSow @ Nov 17 2010, 10:54 AM) Then what do you guys think of those " Close-Up +4 Lens Filter" , "Wide Lens Converter 0.5X + Macro for DSLR", "Raynox DCR-250" stuff for macro? Since its cheaper I reckon the images wont be as good as 1:1 macro lens but in what way? Thanks
Added on November 17, 2010, 10:54 amAnd with the reverse lens method its quite a hassle right? You have to keep holding the lens... For me it's not a hassle once you got the right spot. But the image produced are not as sharp as those macro lenses. Or you can buy a reverse ring for that purpose also. |
|
|
|
|
|
fabianz03
|
Nov 17 2010, 02:11 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(BenSow @ Nov 17 2010, 12:42 PM) example example~~ The examples i saw are not very sharp...
Added on November 17, 2010, 12:42 pmso reverse ring is so you don't have to hold the lens? Yeap, but you have to control the aperture ring though.  BTW I feel regret to sell of my 18-55 because i can no longer take reverse macro photos.  the 18-105 is very hard to take macro photo  This post has been edited by fabianz03: Nov 17 2010, 02:13 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
fabianz03
|
Nov 17 2010, 03:51 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Vampyr3 @ Nov 17 2010, 03:32 PM) Some old photos for handheld macros, not sharp but acceptable to me lah at least....lol » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « 55-200 reverse macro is ok for me  Can meh ? But it's so heavy and bulky...  EDIT : Okay it's possible. Just need a lil patience.   This post has been edited by fabianz03: Nov 17 2010, 04:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0263sec
0.85
6 queries
GZIP Disabled