Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 USJ One Park - Riverdale @ USJ1, usj 1 park

views
     
1282009
post Jul 22 2012, 11:32 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,229 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
"Price - 1242 sf (RM369000 onwards), 892 sf (RM297000 onwards), price increase per floor (RM1000)"

With the launching price like above before discount, I doubt buyers will be losing money upon VP. Who's the developer again? hmm.gif


1282009
post Jul 22 2012, 12:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,229 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(user1984 @ Jul 22 2012, 11:50 AM)
for this prop, if it could not complete in the year of 2013, it is a big lost to the investor...unless it could appreciate more than 100% upon vp assuming it vp at the year of 2015...
*
LAD? shocking.gif




1282009
post Jul 22 2012, 02:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,229 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(user1984 @ Jul 22 2012, 12:14 PM)
wat lad has to do with the lost? dun confuse ppl la...
*
Dont mean to confuse anyone. Is a question mark from me not a statement. Not sure how that can make anyone confused. rclxub.gif


1282009
post Jul 22 2012, 04:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,229 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(Fujixerox @ Jul 22 2012, 02:26 PM)
Booking fee was minimal in this investment to book the property, around 1k if not mistaken. After applying loan, no loan will be realesed until you sign the s&p. Launching date can be long way before s&p signing as some developer yet to get all the authority's approval. thus, cant proceed with s&p agreement. Yet, why are you so concern on the launching date? And what is the losses other than the 1k booking fee? You only lost 1k bank interest. Just dont understand on your statement. icon_question.gif


Added on July 22, 2012, 2:35 pm
What 1282009 meant was LAD compensation to purchaser if late delivery. This to compensate the losses. Off course we dont know whether the developer is gentlemen enough to honour the LAD as per s&p agreement. Nothing confusing.
*
I think he might mean the loan perspective. 3rd prop subject to ltv70% if that prop is late in VP and can't be disposed off. I guess this is the risk flipper needs to take. For medium/long term investors, the concern is lesser (provided developer honors LAD). Just my opinion only, I might be wrong and hope not to confuse anyone (again).



 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0224sec    0.62    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 12:12 AM