Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
-= myforte - naza kia forte owners club =- V9, Leaves You Speechless
|
knickerboxers
|
Oct 26 2010, 08:55 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(izputra @ Oct 26 2010, 05:28 PM) RPM for Forte 2.0 at 110km/h (auto cruise on)..seeing is believing  is it 2.3k or 2.4k RPM? [attachmentid=1853481] Added on October 26, 2010, 5:29 pmthats impressive. is that 6.1L/100km ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
knickerboxers
|
Oct 26 2010, 09:54 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(izputra @ Oct 26 2010, 09:44 PM) Yupp..6.1L/100km. 100% highway from Alor Setar to KL (this pic snapped just before the Duta toll). Most of the time autocruising at 110km/h with 3 adults + 2 small children + almost full boot. I consider that as quite impressive also for a normally aspirated 2.0 C segment car. But during my last long distance travelling, only managed to clock 6.7L/100km for 100% highway driving. Maybe due to some aggresive overtaking maneuver  how about normal day to day driving. what is the average fc on 2.0? most of the info i got is from the 1.6. wondering if 2.0 have better fc compared to 1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
knickerboxers
|
Nov 26 2010, 10:51 PM
|
Getting Started

|
when will the 6 speed be available here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
knickerboxers
|
Feb 15 2011, 05:37 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(forter @ Feb 15 2011, 12:31 PM) You will never regret if you get the 2.0..in terms of fc just slightly more than 1.6..you still can't save alot if you get 1.6..the 2.0 will give kepuasan which is priceless..if you compare fc to the others 2.0 cars..I can say forte 2.0 is among the best..this I'm talking about my 2.0 4speed..for 6 speed should be better.. how slightly more is 2.0 fc? can it get anywhere lower than 9L/100 km city driving?
|
|
|
|
|
|
knickerboxers
|
Feb 15 2011, 07:07 PM
|
Getting Started

|
one of the SA i met told me that 2.0 save more fuel than the 1.6 because of the power to weight ratio. Just wanna check if its truth or myth
|
|
|
|
|