Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
148 Pages « < 45 46 47 48 49 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 -= myforte - naza kia forte owners club =- V9, Leaves You Speechless

views
     
Taipan052
post Nov 15 2010, 12:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
76 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
QUOTE(XionCity @ Nov 15 2010, 12:34 AM)
u r right.....coz i hv good relationship with the boss of the company, as well as his technicals as well....
acually, VS+GC they fixed for me FOC...and won't void warranty
*
and your situation does not apply to other forte owners.
don't mislead others. icon_rolleyes.gif
XionCity
post Nov 15 2010, 12:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
171 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Perth, Western Australia



my mistake....hehehehe
izputra
post Nov 15 2010, 02:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(XionCity @ Nov 15 2010, 12:29 AM)
GPS 90km/h = stock 103km/h
GPS 90km/h = sport rim 108km/h
*
Sorry bro, i dont get it either. Both rims are the same in term of size (diameter) & using back the same tyres (i presume u did not do tyre rotation also), but the speedo gives significantly different speed reading..how come? Rotational speed (of the tyre&rim) are related to its radius (or diameter) right? Since there's no change in diameter for both rims (14" in this case), the speedo should recorded the same speed reading for both rims also (provided the same tyres are installed back at the same position as it was on the previous rims + same tyre pressure for both 'experiment'). That's why i failed to understand your above statement (different speed readings). I dont think the different in rim materials will affect the speed reading. Now your data collecting methods & procedures (comparing speedo & GPS speed readings) are highly questionable...Again, no offence...

Other experts here please shed some light for third party confirmation (did not want my comment to mislead others if i'm wrong). TQ
Taipan052
post Nov 15 2010, 07:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
76 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
QUOTE(XionCity @ Nov 15 2010, 12:29 AM)
GPS 90km/h = stock 103km/h
GPS 90km/h = sport rim 108km/h
*
the correct way to measure is by stick at 100KM/H at speedometer and observe the GPS reading. Since GPS give reading in digital.

or does your SEG come with digital meter / aftermarket meter?

and izputra is correct. speedometer is affected by diameter of the rim.

http://www.ehow.com/facts_6323046_effect-t...er-reading.html

QUOTE
Size
If tires larger than the factory-size tires are installed, the speedometer reading displays a slower speed than the actual speed being traveled. When smaller tires are used to replace the factory-size tires, the speedometer reading displays a faster speed than the actual speed being traveled.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedometer

QUOTE
Most speedometers have tolerances of some 10% plus or minus due to wear on tires as it occurs.[citation needed] Additional sources of error are tire diameter variations due to temperature, pressure, vehicle load, and nominal tire size.
Excessive speedometer error after manufacture can come from several causes but most commonly is due to nonstandard tire diameter, in which case the
percent error = 100x(1 - "new diameter"/"standard diameter").
Nearly all tires now have their size shown as "T/A_W" on the side of the tire (See: Tire code), and the tire's
diameter in inches = TxA/1270 + W.
For example, a standard tire is "185/70R14" with diameter = 185x70/1270 + 14 = 24.20 in. Another is "195/50R15" with 195x50/1270 + 15 = 22.68 in. Replacing the first tire (and wheels) with the second (on 15" wheels), a speedometer reads 1 - 22.68/24.20 = 0.0628 times the correct speed, 6.28%, too high. At an actual speed of 60 mph, the speedometer will indicate 60 * 1.0628 = 63.77 mph, approximately.


QUOTE
GPS devices are capable of showing speed readings based on how far the receiver has moved since the last measurement. As the GPS is an independent* system, its speed calculations are not subject to the same sources of error as the vehicle's speedometer. Instead, the GPS's positional accuracy, and therefore the accuracy of its calculated speed, is dependent on the satellite signal quality at the time. Speed calculations will be more accurate at higher speeds, when the ratio of positional error to positional change is lower. The GPS software may also use a moving average calculation to reduce error.


This post has been edited by Taipan052: Nov 15 2010, 07:38 AM
sallehsi
post Nov 15 2010, 09:01 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
94 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(izputra @ Nov 15 2010, 02:52 AM)
Sorry bro, i dont get it either. Both rims are the same in term of size (diameter) & using back the same tyres (i presume u did not do tyre rotation also), but the speedo gives significantly different speed reading..how come? Rotational speed (of the tyre&rim) are related to its radius (or diameter) right? Since there's no change in diameter for both rims (14" in this case), the speedo should recorded the same speed reading for both rims also (provided the same tyres are installed back at the same position as it was on the previous rims + same tyre pressure for both 'experiment'). That's why i failed to understand your above statement (different speed readings). I dont think the different in rim materials will affect the speed reading. Now your data collecting methods & procedures (comparing speedo & GPS speed readings) are highly questionable...Again, no offence...

Other experts here please shed some light for third party confirmation (did not want my comment to mislead others if i'm wrong). TQ
*
+++1..!!

physics never cease to amaze me smile.gif


shamsul_LP
post Nov 15 2010, 09:32 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
671 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Malaysia our heavenly home



just past through proton showroom....i prefer forte more than inspira...inspria feel so plastic...
DnG
post Nov 15 2010, 09:51 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(shamsul_LP @ Nov 15 2010, 09:32 AM)
just past through proton showroom....i prefer forte more than inspira...inspria feel so plastic...
*
but its handling is superb! drool.gif
Beatmasta
post Nov 15 2010, 09:52 AM

Drummer Guy
****
Senior Member
577 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Borneo Headhunters



damn right its plastiky especially the dashboard, its just too squarish. right away i saw the interior..no comment.
gagilang
post Nov 15 2010, 09:53 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(jam3s @ Nov 14 2010, 11:55 PM)
Aikzz... there's only one kia showroom in ipoh right? Near falim along the way to Menglembu right? but i did see a few units of whitey parking outside. Gosh .. i thought ipoh people will never eye on korean cars as their mentality only on (T&H) so stock would be sufficient to supply in ipoh.
*
Yes. Jalan Lahat. They got stock but just try ur luck... smile.gif

Anyway, different people different mindset. My whole family prefers TaHaN for their resale value and local-easily-find-spare&mod-parts.
But if really go for depreciation calculation, i think Forte really worth the price. Open market value might be lower, but just imagine u are sitting in a car with same segment & standard with honda civic with price that's lower than a honda city. Sell away a honda civic 1.8 5 years later with its interest add-on, at least lose 60k, forte? We already saved in new car price and the interest paid. It might only be able to sell away in a very low price but at least lost lesser than a civic. And again, both car are the same C-segment car. I dun think forte lose civic much. For me, resale value is just for those fully paid owner. I pay 9 years installment, no point to think RV as long as low car price, & interest rate. My friend got a City 9 years installment wiht rate 3.9% but mine only 3%. Overall, even i lose much money, i owned a C-segment car. His only B-segment car nia.. laugh.gif And that's y my eye-ing is different with my family. laugh.gif Inspira looks like lancer but it's still a protong. High interest rate, i bet it need repair like any other protongs too for our local talent built up. So no matter how it looks like a lancer, log card still stated protong car. No point. I dun like copycat. wakaka.. Forte still my prior..
Cheers...

This post has been edited by gagilang: Nov 15 2010, 10:15 AM
eddie_al
post Nov 15 2010, 10:07 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
105 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
QUOTE(jam3s @ Nov 15 2010, 12:07 AM)
Hahaha.. dun get me wrong XionCity.

I'm not in hunger for speed. Currently im driving a slk (small little kenari) so i felt so frustrated to overtake especially in highway and i test drove my bro's new cruze (damn, its like so reluctant to move or maybe its still new below 1k)
*
erm...if you feel the cruze is reluctant to move, the 1.6 Forte wont be any different... nod.gif

2.0 for more acceleration on the go. i am inclined to believe the FC is better overall for 2.0 if you drive in mixed condition. similar comparison has been done in the past for models offered in both 1.6 vs 1.8, 2.0 vs 2.4 etc etc. power to weight ratio affects driving impression. in this case, the Forte is infact a solidly C-segment car being pulled by a "just enough" 1.6cc gamma engine. it's not bad, but less fun, smile.gif

if you want fast overtaking action, a bigger cc is more appropriate.
ggeatweb
post Nov 15 2010, 10:09 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(sallehsi @ Nov 15 2010, 09:01 AM)
+++1..!!

physics never cease to amaze me smile.gif
*
Wei there's not much in physics leh, just simple mathematics.... sweat.gif



If you want to do some more complicated calculations to stimulate your brain brows.gif , you can calculate the relationship between the RPM of your engine vs speed of the wheels....

To get the RPM of the wheels, I think you can get that by dividing the RPM of the engine with the total gear ratio (Ratio of gear you are on * Final Reduction). Then convert the RPM into speed by changing into radians per second multiplied by the circumference of the wheels.

Since the final gear ratio is normally quite high, it means the engine RPM will be higher than the wheel RPM...

This post has been edited by ggeatweb: Nov 15 2010, 10:11 AM
eddie_al
post Nov 15 2010, 10:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
105 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
for anyone wanting to confirm change of rim size affecting speedo reading, you can check with this.

http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

i downsized & upwidth my stock tyres, so i can vouch for a very slight (very minimal, non issue) speed misreading but with better stability whilst getting a little better FC. but of coz, only if you dont mind smaller rims & thicker tyres, smile.gif
DnG
post Nov 15 2010, 10:46 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(gagilang @ Nov 15 2010, 09:53 AM)

Inspira looks like lancer but it's still a protong. High interest rate, i bet it need repair like any other protongs too for our local talent built up. So no matter how it looks like a lancer, log card still stated protong car. No point. I dun like copycat. wakaka.. Forte still my prior..
Cheers...
*
yup, with the higher interest rate for Proton, the overall ownership cost for Inspira is higher than owning a Forte!
wookp
post Nov 15 2010, 11:40 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
497 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: PSN Home/Steam


Poison! Modulo spoiler on a Forte! Please don't quote the whole Fucuking picture
user posted image

This post has been edited by wookp: Nov 15 2010, 11:49 AM
gagilang
post Nov 15 2010, 11:45 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(wookp @ Nov 15 2010, 11:40 AM)
Poison! Modulo spoiler on a Forte!
user posted image
*
thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
How about those 7" height spoiler like subaru & civic? Hardly see otr..
keagan
post Nov 15 2010, 11:49 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
526 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: Kay-El


QUOTE(eddie_al @ Nov 15 2010, 10:07 AM)
erm...if you feel the cruze is reluctant to move, the 1.6 Forte wont be any different... nod.gif

2.0 for more acceleration on the go. i am inclined to believe the FC is better overall for 2.0 if you drive in mixed condition. similar comparison has been done in the past for models offered in both 1.6 vs 1.8, 2.0 vs 2.4 etc etc. power to weight ratio affects driving impression. in this case, the Forte is infact a solidly C-segment car being pulled by a "just enough" 1.6cc gamma engine. it's not bad, but less fun,  smile.gif

if you want fast overtaking action, a bigger cc is more appropriate.
*
can't agree more on this statement... another good example would be a 1.6 vs 1.8 altis...fuel consumption is much much better for the 1.8 vs the 1.6 due to the power to weight ratio =)
wookp
post Nov 15 2010, 11:49 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
497 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: PSN Home/Steam


7" looks fugly to me.. Like you want to sidai pakaian
Taipan052
post Nov 15 2010, 12:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
76 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
QUOTE(wookp @ Nov 15 2010, 11:49 AM)
7" looks fugly to me.. Like you want to sidai pakaian
*
its practical during raining days! tongue.gif biggrin.gif
XionCity
post Nov 15 2010, 12:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
171 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Perth, Western Australia



QUOTE(Taipan052 @ Nov 15 2010, 08:35 AM)
the correct way to measure is by stick at 100KM/H at speedometer and observe the GPS reading. Since GPS give reading in digital.

or does your SEG come with digital meter / aftermarket meter?

and izputra is correct. speedometer is affected by diameter of the rim.

http://www.ehow.com/facts_6323046_effect-t...er-reading.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedometer
*
i dunno....mayb old car, ECU reading gt problem
wat bt weight?? alloy vs. steel....i think that also gave big difference leh....

btw, there's a naza acc. shop in alor setar. yesterday i asked, hw much cost the 'K' logo for front and back...they said RM180, and i was juz like WTF!!!! damn expensive!!!!
and does anyone knws where 2 make custom car stickers?? put own design n name 1....muz b heat+waterproof...if can, i like glow type..
can anyone help me find the sticker?
DnG
post Nov 15 2010, 01:14 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(XionCity @ Nov 15 2010, 12:37 PM)
i dunno....mayb old car, ECU reading gt problem
wat bt weight?? alloy vs. steel....i think that also gave big difference leh....

btw, there's a naza acc. shop in alor setar. yesterday i asked, hw much cost the 'K' logo for front and back...they said RM180, and i was juz like WTF!!!! damn expensive!!!!
and does anyone knws where 2 make custom car stickers?? put own design n name 1....muz b heat+waterproof...if can, i like glow type..
can anyone help me find the sticker?
*
lol even the KIA emblem (the ori 'brand name') is only selling at RM90

148 Pages « < 45 46 47 48 49 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0323sec    0.71    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 02:41 PM