QUOTE(faidz85 @ Oct 24 2010, 02:17 AM)
Coming from an '08 City user, the car isn't that small actually though isn't as spacious as the City but its really close.
The front seats hold your body in place. The interior though a bit plasticky, is beautiful to look at. You will get enough connectivity options.
Car's body is solid. Seems heavy. The design is so nice to look at. I think its a good car for 4 people and <175cm.
The only thing that bugs me a lot is the rear drum brakes. I feel with this type of performance(near/better engine than the current city) they should have at least solid disc rear brakes.
Unfortunately, the car wasn't available for test drive in my place. Am looking forward to test the car's handling and brakes. And the fact that they claim its better on fuel compared to my City is just intriguing. Twin clutch goodness nyum2.
Can anyone enlighten me on the need for rear disc brakes? As far as I can see there are virtually no advantage for having rear disc brakes in normal road use. What do you get out of it apart from being more expensive?The front seats hold your body in place. The interior though a bit plasticky, is beautiful to look at. You will get enough connectivity options.
Car's body is solid. Seems heavy. The design is so nice to look at. I think its a good car for 4 people and <175cm.
The only thing that bugs me a lot is the rear drum brakes. I feel with this type of performance(near/better engine than the current city) they should have at least solid disc rear brakes.
Unfortunately, the car wasn't available for test drive in my place. Am looking forward to test the car's handling and brakes. And the fact that they claim its better on fuel compared to my City is just intriguing. Twin clutch goodness nyum2.
Oct 24 2010, 10:39 AM

Quote
0.0227sec
0.56
6 queries
GZIP Disabled