hello hello

first time post pic here. what do you think ?

comment and criticism. heheh.

oh and i hate putting signatures, tho it looks cool, but i alwys duno how to create one. XD

albnok : haha .. the lines are created with onone phototools. preset that's suppose to be used on human subject. i added that so it doesnt look that boring.

8tvt : A300 18-250 on 24mm focal, f10.

thanks all for feedback.

i havent been shooting alot lately, so need some bump on my back to keep moving forward.

i do use some trick with bokeh2 by alienskin though, just incase your wondering how i achive this dof.

This post has been edited by dtdw: Oct 19 2010, 12:19 PM

Ooo A33

how is it ? whats your verdict ?

well it depends on what level of edit you wanna achieve.

if its something important like wedding, use jpg+raw.

if jz simply, then use jpg.

if you have enuf space and dont bother, jpg+raw.

not quite right.

its raw > pc > edit > save in jpg > upload.

you need to know how to edit raw files first. its not as easy as jpg due to it not storing color and stuff. it gives you the control, rather than jpg which gives you everything you need to upload it without much edit.

but for the average day to day, a jpg is fine, coz nobody bothers, nobody knows.

if it is your job, like masuk newspaper or magazine, then raw.

bobby : you can try it out yourself, dont be afraid to use it.

if you use picasa to view your photos, a raw will appear dull and terrible, but sometimes picasa will apply color to it.

but picasa is just guessing the color and it will difer from the jpg you just took.

raw gives a better range of edit. like very deep edit. and it will not suffer loss, unlike jpg which is already compressed, via in-camera edit.

good to hear. post some vids !

then why are news flying around saying 560/580 will be pushed next year 1st quarter ?

fansoption : what kindof post effect do you use ? seems that you purposely made it look dull to what is suppose to be colorful people/objects/stuffs.