QUOTE(dariofoo @ Aug 28 2011, 07:27 PM)
Just want to add something.
If you want to take the developer to Court to enforce its promise made via the booking form, what you are going for is called specific performance (SP). In property transactions, SP is a usual remedy to compel a seller to sell the property to the purchaser based on a letter of offer to purchase/SPA. In such cases, it is quite clear cut - the property is defined (usually a completed, tangible property) and the other details are all ironed out properly in the letter of offer/SPA.
In your case, there are not much details in the booking form. What you have is just basically description of the property and the price. You now want to compel the developer to construct a property which fits the description (whatever little stated) in the booking form via an order for SP. There's not tangible property yet, so your SP would be for the developer to construct and thereafter sell to you that particular unit at that particular price, as stated in the booking form.
As far as the law is concerned, SP will only be granted where damages is not an adequate remedy. In the earlier example given, the Court will allow the SP as there is no reason why the seller ought to be allowed to off the hook just by paying damages to the purchaser. The purchaser must be given the right to purchase that particular unit at the agreed price. Damages will not be an adequate remedy in that case, as there is no duplicate for the property which the purchaser can turn to. There is only that one particular unit which has been identified and agreed upon.
In your case, there isn't even a tangible property to begin with. The developer can rebut your case by stating the reasons why the project could not be constructed and sold to you at the initial agreed price and/or description. The explanation through their letter (although vague) would be their point of reference. Probably they did not get their developer's license for that description of property? In that case, it has become impossible for them to continue to construct that property. In such case, SP will not be granted by the Court.
Furthermore, in your case, damages (compensation) could be an adequate remedy. What are your losses so far? A few thousand RM in booking fees? You haven't even appointed a lawyer to draft out the SPA. Even if you had, damages would cover reimbursing you all legal fees paid.
As such, I think that it won't be easy to get an order for SP in your case - even if you get around 200-300 purchasers to kick up a fuss.
Nothing to lose to consult a lawyer though. Just don't end up wasting good money chasing bad money. Make sure that the lawyer has a good battle plan lined up.
Good luck

Thanks for your valuable time to answer my queries. Really headache when dealing with this (I'm not the only one kena).
As SPA fees are borne by developer, the developer had sent a letter to the Lawyer to draft the SPA on the initial price of RM192k (we received the cc letter).
Legal firm also sent us a letter asking us to sign the SPA.
While Lawyer is drafting the SPA, the developer haven't obtain a panel bank. So we can't apply for any loan. Since the bank loan agreement legal fees are borne by the developer as well, all we can do is wait. We called up the legal firm and they are aware as well.
After hitting this sales / advertising permit problem, developer ask us to cancel our booking (previously uploaded letter)
http://static.lowyat.net/uploads/attach-82...-1314349885.jpgThen, sent the authorization letter to us to acknowledge so that the legal firm can prepare new SPA based on the new price of RM310k.
http://static.lowyat.net/uploads/attach-82...-1314351452.jpghttp://static.lowyat.net/uploads/attach-82...-1314351468.jpghttp://static.lowyat.net/uploads/attach-82...-1314351490.jpgI guess that's why the booking fees are held by the legal firm now. If we did not authorize / acknowledge this letter, the legal firm can't proceed with the new SPA right?
My losses.. well, the property - they surely underestimated the price and potential growth, and interest free loan to the developer to "test market". In this case, what kinda damages I can claim besides the booking fees and disbursement? If paksa also they cannot do the property according to agreed specification and price, then I rugi RM310k - RM192k = RM118k.
This post has been edited by suiteng: Aug 29 2011, 02:44 AM