Safe? In what sense? Effective? In what sense? All these are subjective questions where no one can give you a definite, general answer. The speed, smoothness and efficiency of the whole transaction depends on the parties involved, the SPA solicitor, the land office, LHDN, the banks itself, the developer (if applicable), etc. If one part gets stuck, the whole engine can't move and gets stuck as well. It has nothing to do with the fact that your loan documentation is handled by a firm who sits on the bank's panel.
Some people may tell you things like, 'Bank panel lawyers are better because they are big, experienced, have a lot of staff, they know what the banks want, etc etc'.
All that is hogwash and once again, is a general statement which is not applicable across the board. Who says bank panel firms are big? And who says that big is good? If you look at it from another perspective, big means that each clerk is handling a lot of files - which means that she would find it difficult to pay more attention to your file to ensure that things move A.S.A.P as she has to divide her attention between all her files. See my point,mate?
As I've always mentioned in this thread - go for recommendations when you appoint a law firm, be it for your SPA or your loan. If you're convinced that your SPA lawyer is capable enough to do your loan doc, and the bank doesn't mind to allow the firm to do it on an ad hoc basis, by all means, use the same law firm!
Ask your friends and family to recommend.
Still not safe to generalise, as slip-ups and mistake do happen internally, but
most of the time, yes, it would be faster
