Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Lawyers Corner, A one-stop centre on lawyers and queries

views
     
cynthusc
post Jan 5 2011, 11:35 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
503 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(dariofoo @ Dec 30 2010, 03:28 PM)
samlhc:
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Here's my advice (assuming that you want vacant possession as soon as possible):

1) Don't waste time and money to enter into an agreement with him;
2) Immediately appoint a lawyer and instruct your lawyer to serve him an eviction notice;
3) Obviously he will ignore as he will stay there until Feb 2011;
4) Instruct your lawyer to file an application to obtain a court order to compel the occupant to vacate the premises;
5) It will take around 2 months at the earliest (very rough estimate) for the lawyer to obtain a hearing date, get the order before the Judge, file the draft order, extract it and file the faired order, and extract the sealed order.
6) Once all that has been done, wait and see if the occupant has vacated the premises or otherwise. If he has not (which he most probably will), then instruct your lawyer to file a distress application in Court - the Court bailiff will escort your lawyer (you may be present as well) and compel the occupant to vacate the premises. The occupant will definitely surrender vacant posession to you by this time.

If you do enter into an agreement as you said, you would have to wait until Feb 2011 to see if he vacates the premises or otherwise. If he doesn't, you have to start steps 2-6 from Feb 2011, and by the time all is done, another few more months would've lapsed.

It all depends as to how fast you want vacant possession. If you don't mind waiting, just wait until Feb 2011 until you start step 2 above. Essentially, any agreement which you enter with him now would not have any basis or relevance come Feb 2011, because you are still obliged to serve him with an eviction notice.

PS: If you want to find out about other purchasers who have bought properties under auction and experienced a similar predicament, may I humbly suggest that you open your own thread in the forum and ask there.  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
An alternative to what Dariofoo has mentioned, if you are in no hurry for vacant possession and if you feel (this is purely subjective) that the previous owner is genuine, sign a simple tenancy agreement with the occupant and get him to pay rental for the next two months. At least with the additional rent you can pay your lawyer to evict the occupant if he/she fails to vacate at the end of February.
cynthusc
post Jul 7 2011, 03:22 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
503 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(xecton @ Jul 6 2011, 11:38 AM)
Hi all,

Something I need clarification with....

I know that is most agreements, the booking fee is not refundable if the Purchaser decided not to go ahead with the sale.
And if the Vendor decided not to go with the sale, then the Vendor has to refund back the booking fee plus an additional sum equivalent to the booking fee.

Now, what if the Purchaser cannot buy because the bank don't approve her loan application?
What happens to the booking fee then?
*
It really depends on what is stated in the Offer to Purchase. If the Offer states that the sale is subject to loan approval, then if the loan application is rejected then the Vendor should refund the earnest deposit/booking fee. If this is not specifically provided for then the Vendor can as per the offer to purchase forfeit the deposit if the SPA is not signed within the timeframe stated in the Offer.


cynthusc
post Oct 7 2011, 04:05 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
503 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(saladin7 @ Sep 22 2011, 06:19 AM)
Hello everyone.

I need serious help. My loan is stuck!!  icon_question.gif  icon_question.gif  icon_question.gif

I have bought a house (auction at high court) last June and only left less than a month before the loan should already release (within 120 days).

My problem is the legal that represent the old owner of the house(bank) did not want to issue letter of undertaking. While my lawyer said my bank didn't want to release loan if they didn't have the letter.

WTF!!! So i don't know which one is suppose to do first? If each party is waiting for each other then it is a deadlock. Can u guys explain so i know which party should i push. tqvm

Is it true that the letter is at high court and my lawyer need to get it from high court before loan can be disburse?
*
I'll try to help you on this.

You mentioned that the "legal that represent the old owner of the house(bank)" is required to give an undertaking to your bank. Did you mean the auctioning bank or the lawyer acting for the bank? Usually the auctioning bank will issue a redemption statement and undertaking to your bank to enable your bank to release the money. This statement will confirm the amount owed and the auctioning bank undertakes to release all the original security documents (Deed of Assignment, title etc) to your bank once they receive the amount owed. I am not sure why the letter is at the High Court. Does the property have an individual title or strata title or is it still under the Developer's name? Please know that for auction properties, there are some procedures that are different from a conventional sale. Make sure your lawyer knows how to handle auction sale transactions.




Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0482sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 08:55 PM