QUOTE(dariofoo @ Mar 16 2011, 11:45 AM)
Once the letter of offer to purchase has been executed and the 2% paid, there is a binding contract to sell and buy. Both parties can enforce it against the other in event of a refusal to proceed.
Don't accept the 2% as it may constitute acceptance of rescission (in layman't term - cancellation/revocation) of the contract.
Is there a clause in the letter that the vendor has to pay an additional penalty as compensation? Most of the time, it would be an equivalent sum of the booking deposit - so the vendor has to pay you 2% + further 2% - if you accept that as compensation, then you can't proceed any further and the matter comes to an end.
Otherwise, advise the lawyer to proceed with a civil suit to seek specific performance of the contract - make sure that your friend really really wants this unit and you must be prepared for all eventualities as the vendor may not act in good faith and there have been cases (similar scenario to auction purchases) where the house is almost, if not completely thrashed. defaced, stripped of fixtures,etc by the vendor who then disappears without a trace.
Advise her to sit down with her lawyer and get the lawyer to explain the pros and cons and eventualities - before deciding to proceed. Or else, just accept the 2% refund, forget it and proceed to look for another unit. Who knows, maybe that one was not meant to be huh?
Cheers.

The cheque she already took back. Does the constitue as acceptance? She didn't bank in yet.
Yes, there is a clause in the letter. But now seller is trying to ignore this, and I guess refuse to pay. She doesn't want to buy the house anymore, but she is asking for compensation. Hence, the demand letter to the seller, which the seller ignored.
Her question is this, the S&P is not signed as seller can't be contacted. However the 21 days is already over. Can she still seek compensation or lawsuit against the seller? She did ask around, it seems she can caveat the property or something.
Appreciate your advise, thank you.