QUOTE(allancth @ Oct 15 2011, 06:02 PM)
Hi all, I need some guidance on how to deal with this issue.
Recently I found an affordable house and decided to buy the place. The contact of the property agent was displayed on a banner of the place, so I called and arranged a meeting with the property agent.
So we met and he showed us the place and I remembered very clearly he mentioned that the owner is a Malaysian Chinese (to be exact, he just said Chinese though). I paid the deposit and I started to find a lawyer. I found one and I passed all the information and documents to my lawyer.
Moving forward few weeks later, at the very end of the process before signing the S&P, my lawyer informed me that the unit is a bumi lot. I've also signed the letter offer from the bank too that time. My lawyer then helped me to get back the earnest deposit, which the property agent did refund to me.
But still, there is the legal fees and a small sum (for the bank) which total to half a thousand approximately I have to pay. Can anyone advise how I can get the agent to bear these cost?
Thanks in advance.
Question: If you had collected all the documents, how did you (or your lawyer) not realise that the unit was a bumi lot? Even when you signed the letter of offer to purchase prepared by the agent, wouldn't it not state the particulars of the vendor? Plus, you or your lawyer should've checked with the management office or developer whether the said unit was a bumi lot or otherwise. You can't merely rely on the representations of the agent. Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware.
As such, it is not a clear cut case of negligence on the part of the agent. You and your lawyer (whom ironically is charging you fees for work done) ought to have been more vigilant. As such, you can send a letter of demand to the agent, or an official complaint to the agency, but you may not have an absolute case against the agent to make him liable for your loss.
From another perspective, why was the lawyer not more vigilant on your behalf as well? Perhaps a finger of blame ought to point that way as well. Think about it.
That is my view on that.
With regard to the letter of offer which you signed, there is no binding contract there as the offer is contingent upon signing of the SPA. By right it ought to have been executed after the SPA is executed. Since the SPA is aborted, the letter of offer does not have any legal effect at all. As such, the bank cannot compel you to pay any fees whatsoever to them.
This post has been edited by dariofoo: Oct 15 2011, 11:31 PM