Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> 15 Kiled, More Than 40 People In Injured, ‘Bus was going way too fast’ News

views
     
Parrot
post Oct 11 2010, 12:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
422 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Somewhere. Isolated from the rest of you pukes.
QUOTE(penmarker @ Oct 10 2010, 10:45 AM)
Those JewTube comments are officially more interesting than the crash.
Parrot
post Oct 11 2010, 04:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
422 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Somewhere. Isolated from the rest of you pukes.
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Oct 11 2010, 03:05 AM)
Overhaul of how the bus industry runs
Until then, people should take train, bus from reputable ones or fly (if they can afford).
*
Oh yeah, like the train is efficient. I remember having spent nearly 10 hours on the train from Kiasuland to the Klang Valley when my peers took just 4 hours traveling along the highway, all while stopping over at Malacca for an hour and two.

Double tracking and electrification won't help either because the service will suffer the same fate as the Komuter down the line; increased ridership and poor management translates to very slow expansion of the rolling stock and rapid deterioration of existing trains and railway equipment. Speed will not matter if they remain very infrequent because it leads to long waiting times.

You're just better off taking the plane, even if it means spending more money and fuel. It's even more so after they demolish what colonial remains of the railway is left. Nobody wants to take pictars of shitty plastic stations, tunnels and bridges.

This post has been edited by Parrot: Oct 11 2010, 04:25 PM
Parrot
post Oct 11 2010, 04:41 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
422 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Somewhere. Isolated from the rest of you pukes.
QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Oct 11 2010, 03:28 AM)
I believe it is still important to expand railway service.

Plane is inefficient in carrying high number of passengers. The relatively short distance of Malaysian cities that could be covered by air makes commuter plane service is inefficient, unlike in the US, where most of its people fly or drive on the interstates.

At the end of the time, it makes to expand rail because it is more efficient in any measure.

Management is one issue, but i believe giving the people the choice of alternative public transport is important.

This is my view, and i do respect your view.
*
Unfortunately, we are in a situation where public transport is so unattractive that we are compelled to drive or take a private bus instead of taking the train or public bus, and I expect this trend to continue into the foreseeable future (despite the fact we are well on our way to becoming a net importer of oil in a few years).

Having seen how the government exerts control on trains services and bus services yet is still able to mismanage them, how the hell am I to believe that this would be any different? They must had dumped billions into these transport systems for 20 years, and what we have now is valued much lower than that.

BTW, I admire how you're open to opinions; friggin' rarity on the Internets.

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0247sec    1.41    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 11:28 AM