Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 [Help!] Ubuntu Problems, everything related to ubuntu goes here

views
     
lilwong
post Mar 3 2009, 06:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(fastcx @ Jan 21 2009, 11:24 PM)
ok, during the boot screen, there press f6 twice, u'll c a list at ur lower right corner, check acpi=off n noapci, press spacebar to select, once u selected tat 2, press escape once, n do install. this will solve the issue, but acpi wont work, means no cpu throttling. if u search online, u'll see lots of documentation or user solution...best thing about linux is, lots of resources for u, if u be initiative. to use linux, is to learn more about I.T.. if ur not the type that likes to learn, linux will not suit u
I beg to differ here. It's really time for the consumer oriented Linux distros (Ubuntu, Xandros, PCLinuxOS being examples) to grow beyond the "u have to want to learn linux" mentality. I maintain a few linux PCs that my friends/relatives use. I set it up for them n they just use it. Easy-peasy. It's easier for me to support them too 'cos I'd setup their router to allow me to SSH in when needed. Day to day usage-wise, they're happy. But setting up the PCs was not so smooth. I had to perform some additional configurations due to some quirks in the hardware support etc. Definitely not something they can do themselves. This is limiting me to just supporting 3-4 of these PCs. I'm not interested in being the defacto PC support person for 50 ppl (esp when I'm not paid for it). That wld really take up all my time. But I would still like for more people to start using Linux (any flavor that suits them).

So, the more consumer-targeted distros can settle individual quirks on the setup process, the better it is. I'm not talking about users like you, me and the average Linux-centric geek. Ubuntu may not even be the best distro for us due to our very different requirements. I'm talking abt ppl who expect things to work like it would on a Mac. Like it or not, I've come to accept that there're ppl who use computers out of necessity, not 'cos they enjoy the experience. The OS should be transparent to them, for all intents n purposes. That's the holy grail.

I've been jumping from distro to distro over the years, especially when I was using Linux in a non-work capacity. Just 'cos I have the time. I had the time to spend 5 days compiling and settings up distros such as Gentoo and (B)LFS. But in my company, I don't have that luxury. Even Fedora 8 (at the time) wasn't good enough 'cos of the sheer number of updates that came in every week and the additional steps needed to setup proprietary codec n font support (trying to balance LivNA and other 3rd party RPM repos was a friggin' nightmare). Kubuntu, was a godsend. Automatix and (after that) Medibuntu made installing all the media stuff a breeze. Most of the time, I could get a working laptop up within an hour (most of the time spent just waiting for installation to be done and updating). It's seriously simple. When things just work, that is.

So, let's look at the roadmap to Linux supremacy:
1) Simple installation of applications (done; Synaptic/Adept/PackageKit fulfills this already, just need more apps in the repos)
2) Simple setup (done; the LiveCD concept was brilliant and I believe Knoppix was the pioneer in this)
3) Fool-proof installation (pending; there're still too many PC/laptop configurations that do not work perfectly just yet)


lilwong
post Mar 3 2009, 09:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(LEVIATHAN @ Mar 3 2009, 08:34 PM)
This link is referred.

|
- dists
- indices
- ls-lR.gz
- pool
- project

I'm currently debmirror the repo, and I'd love to know the difference between dists and pool. Is pool the software collection (like the actual library), and dists is a pointer (like a kinonavi at Kinokuniya) to specific software for specific releases (intrepid, jaunty, karmic and such)?

We have MediBuntu, Google and Canonical being third party sauces. What's the name of the official repo? Official?
*
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reposito...ory-howto#pools

QUOTE
With automatic repositories, distributing the packages in the different directories will quickly lead to an unmanageable beast. It is also a waste of space and bandwidth, as there are many packages (for example documentation packages) which are the same for all architectures.

In these cases, a possible solution is a pool. A pool is an additional directory under the repository root containing all packages (the binaries for all architectures, distributions, and components, and all the sources). Through a smart combination of override files (which are not covered in this document) and of scripts many problems can be avoided. A nice example of a pooled repository is the Debian repository itself.
looks like u're right smile.gif

lilwong
post Mar 9 2009, 04:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(roimekoi @ Mar 9 2009, 01:52 AM)
how to check my own ip address using ubuntu?
*
either "ifconfig -a", which will give you info abt all your network interfaces, or "ifconfig <device name>" e.g. "ifconfig eth0"


lilwong
post Mar 18 2009, 03:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
127 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(Cannonfodder @ Mar 18 2009, 03:14 PM)
If you face this issue, you will face it no matter which distribution you use. The GPM is the same as long as you use GNOME. Why don't you give KDE a try, I think you should be able to get 4.2 in Ubuntu backports. I run KDE 4.2 in Fedora and as far as power management is concerned, it's very reliable.
*
Ya know, I don't think it's got anything to do with the Power Manager front-ends, whether KDE or Gnome. I've had PowerDevil (KDE) running swell on 1 machine and totally wonky on another and both are using the exact same distro n patch level.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0385sec    0.40    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 09:21 PM