QUOTE(SecretPaladin @ Oct 12 2010, 02:29 PM)
SO i will put Symbian 1st, 2nd Symbian and 3rd also Symbian. End Discussion.
I commend you on your unbiased and impartial judgement.
Seriously though, I guess it depends on the user. In my case, browsing on a Symbian device is a pain in the ass. Even with the new improvements on Symbian^3, it's still not as fluid or optimized as Android's or iPhone's.
Connectivity-wise though, I'm happy to say Symbian phone come out on top. I've never had problems connecting to WiFi/Edge/3G with Symbian phones, only with Android/iPhone devices (although usually in special cases).
I've also become addicted to storing all my contacts in Gmail and syncing them via Android/iPhone. Symbian is a bit more difficult which is why I seldom carry my Nokia phones around anymore.
Camera-wise, there's no competition. Nokia makes better camera phones, especially N82 and N8, while Android and iPhone cameras are so-so only.
I think in the long term though, Android has the most survivability and long term prospects. It's just too friggin flexible. I've seen people customize it in really crazy ways through installing alternative home applications and flashing ROMs. Development on Symbian/Qt is a pain in the ass if you're tried it. iPhone applications are the easiest to develop thanks to standard width and height (480x320) in the code, whether it's iPhone 1 or iPhone 4.