Can tell me your settings/plug-in and what type of song u use the settings for? Thanks
This post has been edited by genjo: Oct 7 2010, 04:08 PM
What are you guys settings for foobar 2000
What are you guys settings for foobar 2000
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 04:08 PM, updated 16y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,431 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
Can tell me your settings/plug-in and what type of song u use the settings for? Thanks
This post has been edited by genjo: Oct 7 2010, 04:08 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 05:51 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
890 posts Joined: Oct 2009 From: Najidama Bay |
No special settings. Only plugin I have is the APE decoder. Other than that-- nothing.
|
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 06:55 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
i only use the built-in EQ to add little bass.
|
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 07:49 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,649 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
has none dsp installed, deleted everything to save that few KB of space and only asio support
then everything else is for GUI, like wshpanel and columnsui |
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 09:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,293 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Sarawak |
I still use DS with Resampler(PPHS) upsampling to 192000, then Monkey Audio plug in.
|
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 10:26 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
382 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Kuantan |
APE, Tak, TTA plugins... with output setting to DAC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 01:18 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
890 posts Joined: Oct 2009 From: Najidama Bay |
QUOTE(Bonchi @ Oct 7 2010, 07:49 PM) has none dsp installed, deleted everything to save that few KB of space and only asio support I have loads of DSPs, but haven't used any at all. Not for months now. Bro Bonchi, I believe that DSPs are only those extras that affects sound production and processing in the player: all the other things we download are necessarily not considered DSPs, yes? I agree however that the GUI is MUCH better with WSHPanel and Columns UI. Can't live without them!then everything else is for GUI, like wshpanel and columnsui |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 07:25 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,649 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(ArianneG @ Oct 8 2010, 01:18 AM) I have loads of DSPs, but haven't used any at all. Not for months now. Bro Bonchi, I believe that DSPs are only those extras that affects sound production and processing in the player: all the other things we download are necessarily not considered DSPs, yes? I agree however that the GUI is MUCH better with WSHPanel and Columns UI. Can't live without them! if the .dll is a dsp, usually it is mentioned in the filename itself |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 10:31 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya |
[attachmentid=1823178]
Foobar buffer @ 50ms ASIO buffer @ 64 samples [attachmentid=1823181] Full file buffering max 2GB cpu usage nearly zero and mem usage orignally is 6MB+size of song i'm playing(max 2GB) [attachmentid=1823219] set foobar's priority to realtime btw, 64samples ASIO buffer on my lappy is only possible when i enable full file buffering, i think it's because it's faster to access from RAM than HD... Windows volume control @ 100%, Speaker volume @80%+. Volume is controlled from foobar... said to give better headroom/dynamic range, and prevents overload/clipping when using lossy formats... [attachmentid=1823234] Peak meter when playing an MP3 shows crossing the 0dB line... by reducing the volume in foobar it wont clip the windows volume when sent to hardware... but try it yourself and see the results... Remember to set the volume in foobar at at least -35dB if u set 100% at windows to avoid sudden burst. To see volume figure, right click on the bottom bar and tick "show volume" no dsp used, dont wanna color the sound This post has been edited by andrew9292: Oct 8 2010, 10:48 AM |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 01:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,293 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Sarawak |
QUOTE(andrew9292 @ Oct 8 2010, 10:31 AM) [attachmentid=1823234] Peak meter when playing an MP3 shows crossing the 0dB line... by reducing the volume in foobar it wont clip the windows volume when sent to hardware... but try it yourself and see the results... Remember to set the volume in foobar at at least -35dB if u set 100% at windows to avoid sudden burst. To see volume figure, right click on the bottom bar and tick "show volume" no dsp used, dont wanna color the sound I haven't realize it does give some difference |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 01:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,649 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
@bro andrew.. nice guide there ..thanks!
also did the same on the hardware buffering part tho i didnt set mine to 2gb on full file buffering but i will try that later btw i would like to suggest setting apply gain under playback to "none" as that will eliminate album gains.. those situation where some songs are loud while some are very soft. |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 02:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 02:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,193 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
@andrew9262
wah nice settings down there bro. I'm thinking that with the full file buffering, probably help me a little when using foobar2000 on battery with less HDD activity. |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 02:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,293 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Sarawak |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 02:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras |
i read somewhere it is best to change the volume on your audio interface/speaker volume knob and leave foobar and windows audio volume to 100%. Because when you lower the volume on foobar you'll lose some data. I'm not sure and i don't remember the original detailed term, but that person told me it won't be close to bit-perfect (as it is hard to get 100% bit-perfect, lots of factor can manipulate it). I for sure didn't hear any difference wheter it is bit-perfect or not, so it does not matters to me.
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 02:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,293 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Sarawak |
Need to search on the architecture 1st.
But for windows volume, i'm not sure too about the bit perfect stuff but i can confirm that some amplifiers if you low down the input power, it will loose out the details even though you crank up the amplifier volume because the input signal is too low. |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 04:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Oct 8 2010, 02:17 PM) i read somewhere it is best to change the volume on your audio interface/speaker volume knob and leave foobar and windows audio volume to 100%. Because when you lower the volume on foobar you'll lose some data. I'm not sure and i don't remember the original detailed term, but that person told me it won't be close to bit-perfect (as it is hard to get 100% bit-perfect, lots of factor can manipulate it). I for sure didn't hear any difference wheter it is bit-perfect or not, so it does not matters to me. hmm, lower the volume on foobar2000 can lose data? |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 06:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
920 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Kuala Lumpur |
Used to have many setting, but now none.
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 10:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
345 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
what is replay gain for? any setting for tat?
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 11:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
955 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Petaling Jaya |
QUOTE(Bonchi @ Oct 8 2010, 01:56 PM) @bro andrew.. nice guide there ..thanks! The RAM buffering settings refers to the maximum RAM Foobar can use. The memory usage will be Foobar's original memory usage+the file size of your song. Unless you have a 2GB song, it will never go that far... In fact for most users, setting to 512MB (524288kB) should be enough as most lossless files wont cross 200MB per track also did the same on the hardware buffering part tho i didnt set mine to 2gb on full file buffering but i will try that later btw i would like to suggest setting apply gain under playback to "none" as that will eliminate album gains.. those situation where some songs are loud while some are very soft. QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Oct 8 2010, 02:17 PM) i read somewhere it is best to change the volume on your audio interface/speaker volume knob and leave foobar and windows audio volume to 100%. Because when you lower the volume on foobar you'll lose some data. I'm not sure and i don't remember the original detailed term, but that person told me it won't be close to bit-perfect (as it is hard to get 100% bit-perfect, lots of factor can manipulate it). I for sure didn't hear any difference wheter it is bit-perfect or not, so it does not matters to me. True statement there. Lowing the software volume will affect the noise floor as it pushes the bits near the noise floor "down", to be out of range of most DACs... but unless you have music that has data/music at near -100dB, there wont really be a difference... I used to be a big fan of bit perfect (100% all digital volume control, 44100khz 16bit) until i realize it's disadvantages-Setting 100% at application volume will be bit perfect, when outputing from the application to windows mixer. -Setting the windows volume to 100% will allow Foobar to play in the full dynamic range. -Setting both of above to be at 100% will allow True bit perfect in theory. Eg... what is at -3dB at foobar will also be -3dB at windows mixer, and that will be that. -But setting both at 100% will cause clipping with lossy formats. Eg... +1dB overflow at foobar, will be "flattened" or clipped to 0dB at windows volume. Disadvantage 1. -Setting both to 100% will cause very high output in the hardware, dac, opamps, whatever u name it. And such high output isn't ideal for most usage, you are driving the hardware at 100% or sometimes even overloading, oftenly this will cause distortion+heat. Disadvantage 2. -Setting both to 100% will send a very high analogue output to your speaker, which has it's own preamp/amp inside, if the music is over the range of the amps, it will clip again+heat. And advance/high end amps with anti distortion control will further clip the sound by removing the peaks that are causing the amp to clip, either by using a hard limiter, intelligent limiter, or dynamic range compressor (also a kind of limiter) and this will affect the sound. Disadvantage 3 & 4. -Setting the volume in foobar will prevent clipping at windows mixer. -Setting the volume at your speaker/amp to 60-100% (varies amp to amp) will again open the dynamic range (what is soft can now be heard clearer in most cases) -Setting the volume at foobar low, windows volume@100 = no clipping + high or [full volume at speaker(low gain amps)] = u get a loud sound without overloading anything -Setting the volume at foobar too low, u push the lower range of the music out of range, but oftenly there is no information at such low level (around -100dB for most DACs) I'm actually using live sound concept, in live sound setups, the final output stage or amps are normally at full or around 80%, so that there can be huge range to play with at the mixing console. If u set low output volume at final level, u will have to push the volume at processing stage to a very high level to get the same volume a.k.a loudness maximization... basically, the input must not be too loud, neither must it be too soft to the point where the really soft passages of instruments go missing... but again, this is for most cases... different hardware will behave differently... use yor ears to decide QUOTE(Cosef @ Oct 8 2010, 02:43 PM) Need to search on the architecture 1st. This is also true, but it really depends on setup to setup But for windows volume, i'm not sure too about the bit perfect stuff but i can confirm that some amplifiers if you low down the input power, it will loose out the details even though you crank up the amplifier volume because the input signal is too low. ----- My setting might work well for me, and for some, but not all This post has been edited by andrew9292: Oct 8 2010, 11:29 PM |
|
|
Oct 9 2010, 12:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,649 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
getting full 100% bit perfect is not easy lol.. even our downloaded/EAC ripped flacs may not be 100% some times they are 99.9% accurate according to logs
i believe you cant get 100% on CDs as well if you compare it to the master copy but the effort put in to achieve that in its own method is what makes and audiophile an audiophile:P oh well.. as long as there's no audible fault .. lets just enjoy the music |
|
|
Oct 9 2010, 12:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras |
|
|
|
Oct 9 2010, 01:03 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
902 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: Feel like i'm in Mars |
Myself foobar/windows volume/soundcard at 90%-100%. Control volume from the stereo amp.
Sounds good to me. |
|
|
Oct 9 2010, 01:22 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
My setting is use ASIO plugin, with ASIO buffer latency 10ms and foobar buffer is at default 1000ms (used to put at lowest, but no audible difference to me). I use SoX resampler to resample to 44.1kHz if any of my file is below that. Other than that, everything is untouched.
Used to equalize my headphone by using VST wrapper plugin and Electri-Q equalizer but at the end I ditch it since I don't use headphone much nowadays |
|
|
Oct 9 2010, 01:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,649 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
anyone uses secret rabbit code re-sampler here? what you guys think about this
currently i have my re-sampler remove but i have to use it sometimes for weird 48khz mastered albums and sometimes vinyl rips which are 96khz.. tho i hear audible difference if i have it on @ 44.1khz vs having it turned off |
|
|
Oct 9 2010, 03:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
677 posts Joined: May 2005 From: 1s and 0s |
Currently using SSRC resampler at 88.2Khz as i feel it slightly opens up the soundstage and i can hear abit more details in the highs. PPHS softens the transients abit too much, useful for sharp recordings but i stick to SSRC most of the time. Before i got a DAC upgrade resampling or not didn't really make a difference.
|
|
|
Oct 14 2010, 02:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,649 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
@bro andrew.. finally got back to my rig and tested the file buffer from memory up to 512mb .. heck its sounds alot cleaner as compared to value set 0
thanks for the guide |
|
|
Oct 14 2010, 05:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
but i didn't feel the different.
|
|
|
Oct 14 2010, 05:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,649 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
prolly cuz the HDD containing my songs is slow and old
file buffering removed stuttering .. less noise too giving me kinda like a clean experience |
|
|
Oct 15 2010, 10:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
646 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
QUOTE(Categg @ Oct 9 2010, 04:43 PM) Currently using SSRC resampler at 88.2Khz as i feel it slightly opens up the soundstage and i can hear abit more details in the highs. PPHS softens the transients abit too much, useful for sharp recordings but i stick to SSRC most of the time. Before i got a DAC upgrade resampling or not didn't really make a difference. ya upsampling really open the stage... but did u try JRMC?Added on October 15, 2010, 10:10 am QUOTE(Bonchi @ Oct 14 2010, 03:27 AM) @bro andrew.. finally got back to my rig and tested the file buffer from memory up to 512mb .. heck its sounds alot cleaner as compared to value set 0 buffering the file into memory will have resulted in a less jitter.thanks for the guide This post has been edited by vir___killer: Oct 15 2010, 10:10 AM |
|
|
Oct 15 2010, 04:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,037 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: 6-feet under |
Hey guys,
I'm using Go-vibe external DAC. How do I ASIO it? I want sound isolation like I did last time |
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 11:37 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(andrew9292 @ Oct 8 2010, 10:31 AM) [attachmentid=1823178] hi bro andrew..Foobar buffer @ 50ms ASIO buffer @ 64 samples [attachmentid=1823181] Full file buffering max 2GB cpu usage nearly zero and mem usage orignally is 6MB+size of song i'm playing(max 2GB) [attachmentid=1823219] set foobar's priority to realtime btw, 64samples ASIO buffer on my lappy is only possible when i enable full file buffering, i think it's because it's faster to access from RAM than HD... Windows volume control @ 100%, Speaker volume @80%+. Volume is controlled from foobar... said to give better headroom/dynamic range, and prevents overload/clipping when using lossy formats... [attachmentid=1823234] Peak meter when playing an MP3 shows crossing the 0dB line... by reducing the volume in foobar it wont clip the windows volume when sent to hardware... but try it yourself and see the results... Remember to set the volume in foobar at at least -35dB if u set 100% at windows to avoid sudden burst. To see volume figure, right click on the bottom bar and tick "show volume" no dsp used, dont wanna color the sound Can u help me to find best setting for my system? i'm using creative sb xtrememusic support asio native, f2k, and win 7 64bit. i'm very glad see your setting for u'r system, may u can help on my system too.. thanks before.. Added on October 22, 2010, 11:40 am QUOTE(Bonchi @ Oct 14 2010, 02:27 AM) @bro andrew.. finally got back to my rig and tested the file buffer from memory up to 512mb .. heck its sounds alot cleaner as compared to value set 0 what's u'r audio system bonchi?thanks for the guide may u can help me to find best setting for my audio system? i'm using creative sb xtrememusic and f2k. thanks before.. This post has been edited by dtonies75: Oct 22 2010, 11:40 AM |
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 01:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
544 posts Joined: Mar 2010 From: Audiophile Land |
QUOTE(andrew9292 @ Oct 8 2010, 10:31 AM) [attachmentid=1823178] bro, can share how u make ASIO4ALL work? mind give me the dl link???Foobar buffer @ 50ms ASIO buffer @ 64 samples [attachmentid=1823181] Full file buffering max 2GB cpu usage nearly zero and mem usage orignally is 6MB+size of song i'm playing(max 2GB) [attachmentid=1823219] set foobar's priority to realtime btw, 64samples ASIO buffer on my lappy is only possible when i enable full file buffering, i think it's because it's faster to access from RAM than HD... Windows volume control @ 100%, Speaker volume @80%+. Volume is controlled from foobar... said to give better headroom/dynamic range, and prevents overload/clipping when using lossy formats... [attachmentid=1823234] Peak meter when playing an MP3 shows crossing the 0dB line... by reducing the volume in foobar it wont clip the windows volume when sent to hardware... but try it yourself and see the results... Remember to set the volume in foobar at at least -35dB if u set 100% at windows to avoid sudden burst. To see volume figure, right click on the bottom bar and tick "show volume" no dsp used, dont wanna color the sound |
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 02:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,271 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Sometimes here, sometimes there. |
settings are what it came with, output via USB Audio DAC, select track and click play is all there is for me, then adjust volume to taste .... |
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 02:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,186 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Beaumont, Baile Ath Cliath, EIRE. |
Exactly! Just click to play!
|
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 05:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,649 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
Added on October 22, 2010, 11:40 am what's u'r audio system bonchi? may u can help me to find best setting for my audio system? i'm using creative sb xtrememusic and f2k. thanks before.. [/quote] mine is just some cheapo soundcard weird to a headphone directly for best setting is hard cuz we all have diff taste.. will need to resort to using some DSP what bro Andrew here suggest is for low latency only doing the file buffer thing gave me less crackling due to RAM is faster than HDD |
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 05:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras |
there are no point obsessing of Asio output. There are no audible difference between Direct Sound and Asio unless your Direct Sound driver are broken. Asio purpose is to reduce latency when doing recording. And the full file buffering also not meant to produce greater sound quality.
|
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 05:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Oct 22 2010, 05:47 PM) there are no point obsessing of Asio output. There are no audible difference between Direct Sound and Asio unless your Direct Sound driver are broken. Asio purpose is to reduce latency when doing recording. And the full file buffering also not meant to produce greater sound quality. No, the main point of using ASIO is to bypass kMixer during Windows XP days. In Vista and 7 its now possible to achieve bit perfect out without the needs of ASIO. DirectSound is more than enough unless the soundcard you use do some processing, if you concern WASAPI will do just that, easier as you don't need to install additional stuff in your PC if your soundcard don't have native ASIO |
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 09:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras |
yes that is very true. Kmixer in Windows XP done a lousy job and if i'm correct it also perform resampling. And it is also noticeable. Now, i think most people use Windows Vista or 7 they doesn't need to bypass the mixer anymore since they're used new architecture.
Added on October 22, 2010, 9:42 pm QUOTE(Bonchi @ Oct 9 2010, 12:04 AM) getting full 100% bit perfect is not easy lol.. even our downloaded/EAC ripped flacs may not be 100% some times they are 99.9% accurate according to logs That is why AccurateRip exist. To ensure that your rip is perfect.i believe you cant get 100% on CDs as well if you compare it to the master copy but the effort put in to achieve that in its own method is what makes and audiophile an audiophile:P oh well.. as long as there's no audible fault .. lets just enjoy the music This post has been edited by Angel of Deth: Oct 22 2010, 09:42 PM |
|
|
Oct 22 2010, 11:44 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(Najmods @ Oct 9 2010, 01:22 AM) My setting is use ASIO plugin, with ASIO buffer latency 10ms and foobar buffer is at default 1000ms (used to put at lowest, but no audible difference to me). I use SoX resampler to resample to 44.1kHz if any of my file is below that. Other than that, everything is untouched. Hi Najmods, btw we're using same SC...Used to equalize my headphone by using VST wrapper plugin and Electri-Q equalizer but at the end I ditch it since I don't use headphone much nowadays Can you share to me how u setting your system to get best performance? I'm really confused to chose wasapi or asio for xmusic, cause both give me good sound, how about you? |
|
|
Oct 23 2010, 12:30 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras |
Najmod has stated before that he set his foobar2k output to Wasapi and set the playback devices sample rate to 16-bit 44.1 kHz to match his playback format. Honestly, there are no audible difference for me between DS, KS, Asio or Wasapi. I choose to use Asio because it is convenient for me because it mute other playback except for my music. Wasapi does the better in term of isolating the music and other playback sound but it have issue with my sound card driver, maybe because the plugin is still buggy (most of foobar plugin are buggy anyway). The only thing i dislike about Asio is i must close any other source of playback such as Youtube, Flash Player, sometime must kill internet browser process in the task bar in order to get Asio works, while Wasapi didn't have this issue.
|
|
|
Oct 23 2010, 01:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
QUOTE(dtonies75 @ Oct 22 2010, 11:44 PM) Hi Najmods, btw we're using same SC... Angel of Deth already say what I wanted to say. Since you use XtremeMusic just use ASIO. If ASIO have some problem when browsing (watching flash videos), just use either WASAPI so only your music is played, or simply use DirectSound, both sound won't be uninterrupted. Can you share to me how u setting your system to get best performance? I'm really confused to chose wasapi or asio for xmusic, cause both give me good sound, how about you? Oh and also open up Creative Control Panel, set to Audio Creation mode, and enable Bit-Matched playback and you set to go. In this state even DirectSound should provide bit perfect playback |
|
|
Oct 23 2010, 08:41 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Oct 23 2010, 12:30 AM) Najmod has stated before that he set his foobar2k output to Wasapi and set the playback devices sample rate to 16-bit 44.1 kHz to match his playback format. Honestly, there are no audible difference for me between DS, KS, Asio or Wasapi. I choose to use Asio because it is convenient for me because it mute other playback except for my music. Wasapi does the better in term of isolating the music and other playback sound but it have issue with my sound card driver, maybe because the plugin is still buggy (most of foobar plugin are buggy anyway). The only thing i dislike about Asio is i must close any other source of playback such as Youtube, Flash Player, sometime must kill internet browser process in the task bar in order to get Asio works, while Wasapi didn't have this issue. Yeah thanks a lot brother..Added on October 23, 2010, 8:48 am QUOTE(Najmods @ Oct 23 2010, 01:08 AM) Angel of Deth already say what I wanted to say. Since you use XtremeMusic just use ASIO. If ASIO have some problem when browsing (watching flash videos), just use either WASAPI so only your music is played, or simply use DirectSound, both sound won't be uninterrupted. Ok Najmods i'll try to my rig..Oh and also open up Creative Control Panel, set to Audio Creation mode, and enable Bit-Matched playback and you set to go. In this state even DirectSound should provide bit perfect playback BTW thanks for your suggestion. How about you setting buffer length on f2k and buffer latency on Creative ASIO? Now i'am using f2k buffer length 50ms, and full file buffering up to 512mb (like suggestion bro andrew), on Creative ASIO buffer latency set to 10ms (like your setting). And on Audio Creation Mode EAX effects set to disable. Any suggestion for me? This post has been edited by dtonies75: Oct 23 2010, 08:56 AM |
|
|
Oct 23 2010, 08:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
QUOTE(dtonies75 @ Oct 23 2010, 08:41 AM) Ok Najmods i'll try to my rig.. As long as it does not produce any clipping/distortion/cracking, it'll be fine. Low ASIO buffer latency could produce clipping/cracking on some slower system, but even my system at 800MHz low power setting it still work fine. It vary from one system to another.BTW thanks for your suggestion. How about you setting buffer length on f2k and buffer latency on Creative ASIO? Now i'am using f2k buffer length 50ms, and full file buffering up to 512mb (like suggestion bro andrew), on Creative ASIO buffer latency set to 10ms (like your setting). Any suggestion for me? |
|
|
Oct 23 2010, 09:08 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
4 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(Najmods @ Oct 23 2010, 08:56 AM) As long as it does not produce any clipping/distortion/cracking, it'll be fine. Low ASIO buffer latency could produce clipping/cracking on some slower system, but even my system at 800MHz low power setting it still work fine. It vary from one system to another. EAX effects on Audio Creation Mode disable or enabled?Can I set Bass and Treble on Audio Creation Mode? Because my speaker too bad on bass. |
|
|
Oct 25 2010, 03:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,522 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Everywhere. |
I'll just use resampler and advance limiter for DSP and WASAPI for output with 16-bit output data format.
|
|
|
Oct 25 2010, 06:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
QUOTE(dtonies75 @ Oct 23 2010, 09:08 AM) EAX effects on Audio Creation Mode disable or enabled? The purpose of using ASIO is to get bit perfect output, if you going to play with treble and bass you'd better off with the normal DirectSound because its already defeats the purpose of using ASIO in the first place. EAX is used for games, unless if its on Entertainment mode where you could do room emulation.Can I set Bass and Treble on Audio Creation Mode? Because my speaker too bad on bass. |
|
|
Oct 25 2010, 11:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,705 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: Malaysia |
is there a component to replace the default playback button?
Added on October 25, 2010, 11:50 pmP.s. except column ui This post has been edited by Sphenix: Oct 25 2010, 11:50 PM |
|
|
Oct 26 2010, 09:56 AM
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2010, 11:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,705 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: Malaysia |
|
|
|
Oct 28 2010, 12:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
890 posts Joined: Oct 2009 From: Najidama Bay |
Find the album art online... Set a panel to display album art.
|
|
|
Oct 28 2010, 09:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,705 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: Malaysia |
|
|
|
Oct 28 2010, 10:33 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,705 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: Malaysia |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2011, 12:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
920 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Kuala Lumpur |
For audio purist one thing for sure turn off all dsp/eq. Remember to DISABLE the replay gain feature. It really sucks if turn on.
|
|
|
Mar 6 2011, 02:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
788 posts Joined: Dec 2005 |
Install Asio and sound great already, I doubt you can improve further... The sound improves as u improve your hardware... that's my experience
|
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 07:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,934 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Audiophilia valley... |
The most important is your hardwares such as DAC/soundcards, amps, speakers/headphones. If not, no matter how you set it would sound good in sennsonic or SonicGear.
|
|
|
Mar 17 2011, 09:21 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
85 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
|
|
|
Mar 18 2011, 01:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
583 posts Joined: Aug 2010 |
Use boss c5 la!! guarantee for sound quality..
|
|
|
Mar 18 2011, 02:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,910 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: Andy @ London.com Status: N/A |
anyone know how to make the lyrics show work?
update: I'm using dark one UI. just found how to click the lyrics show panel out but anyway to make it like brother Sphenix that it's nicely inside the windows? Update2: shit, i press add lyrics panel and it's covering my whole GUI! anyone how to close it back instead of reinstalling the software? This post has been edited by Andy0625: Mar 18 2011, 02:29 AM |
|
|
Mar 18 2011, 03:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,649 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(Andy0625 @ Mar 18 2011, 02:18 AM) anyone know how to make the lyrics show work? the default butten is always there.update: I'm using dark one UI. just found how to click the lyrics show panel out but anyway to make it like brother Sphenix that it's nicely inside the windows? Update2: shit, i press add lyrics panel and it's covering my whole GUI! anyone how to close it back instead of reinstalling the software? *edit* do export your fcl theme often (include all the scripts as well) to prevent things like this to happen This post has been edited by Bonchi: Mar 18 2011, 03:20 AM |
|
|
Mar 18 2011, 11:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,910 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: Andy @ London.com Status: N/A |
where's the default button, bonchi?
|
|
|
Mar 18 2011, 02:33 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
225 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Mar 18 2011, 05:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,271 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Sometimes here, sometimes there. |
|
|
|
Mar 19 2011, 01:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,649 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(Andy0625 @ Mar 18 2011, 11:36 AM) its not really a default button but more like a quick setup that allows you to change it to default layout (im assuming that youre using columnsUI)» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « but there's a workaround to remove a certain panel.. you can try this first before resorting to go back to default.. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « yes, just right click on the panel you wanna edit and click remove to remove it |
|
|
Mar 19 2011, 12:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,910 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: Andy @ London.com Status: N/A |
QUOTE(Bonchi @ Mar 19 2011, 01:52 AM) its not really a default button but more like a quick setup that allows you to change it to default layout (im assuming that youre using columnsUI) Thanks man, I just choose the Theme to default and then change back to Columns UI and it works again - except for all the song list gone. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « but there's a workaround to remove a certain panel.. you can try this first before resorting to go back to default.. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « yes, just right click on the panel you wanna edit and click remove to remove it |
|
|
Jul 2 2012, 05:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Jul 2005 |
Borrow this thread for a question.
I have a Hippo Cri Cri+, well it does support up to 24-bit/96Khz, but I have a FLAC which is 24-bit/192KHz, and I can't use the WASAPI to send audio directly to the DAC, any other solution other than using the DS plugins? |
|
|
Jul 2 2012, 06:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,594 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Singapore |
use the resampler in foobar and set the output to 96KHz.
|
|
|
Jul 2 2012, 07:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Jul 2005 |
|
|
|
Jul 2 2012, 08:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
488 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Now and Then, Here and There |
Pure vanilla Foobar2k. I rarely use EQ except when I listen to electronic. I usually turn my EQ off (flat) when listening to classical, orchestra and jazz.
|
| Change to: | 0.0393sec
0.77
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 12:03 AM |