Good poison!
Thanks for the effort, yuheng!

Because the (manufacturer) cost might less than USD10,possibly around USD5

Anyway,since it's quite cheap,compare to others,worth to buy one and playing with mod.

Can try name card holder as casing,then spray with colour pattern.

Anyway,why no one ask does it sound ANALOG or not??hahaha!

Is analog output..
But whether analog enough is another matter,I guess this is his meaning

Yea,I know.
But I think we able to get what is able to squeeze from that amount of money.

LG

VK! LOL!

Now another question,does it  sounds MUSICAL???    

Any idea what is the dimension of this board? Looks like can fit inside a candy box. Then you gf will wonder why you eat so much sweet recently.

don't you have to study for your last two papers?

turn off computer la.

wa....very small ohhhhh

i go and find pendrive casing tomorrow.
then thinking of rip the pendrive casing out to put this.
haha

thickness of the board?

Ok-- sorry to interrupt the fun for a bit, but someone asked earlier if it can match or at least come close to the Ordnance-1 DAC for SQ. Well? Can or cannot? In the market for sub-RM100 DAC as a gift, and so I can keep my Ordnance at home...

This is even cheaper than DIY a Bantam DAC or Alien DAC.

I should... I shouldn't...I should... I shouldn't...I should... I shouldn't...I should... I shouldn't...I should... I shouldn't......

all metal film can sound good?

u need to change ur signature bro, or else mod will nuke it.

i heard this thing as a laid back or warm signature...something similar to sansa clip+... true?

if just playing slow songs, slightly above gumstick.
if fast paced, then below gumstick and/or clip+.
if consider fullness of the sound body and bass alone, above gumstick.

overall, unless i figured a way to make it faster sounding.. personally i would put it below gumstick.

problem is.. if u are not using good phones or speakers and good source, the difference in speed would be small.

either way it is still rm90 vs rm315. for the price, the value is there.

Hmm. Burning in is also probably a good idea. I am thinking that everything needs burn in for audio stuff, even the DAC, strangely. I'm not sure if Shroom EB qualifies as slow then: because on Shroom EB the DAC was still somewhat slow, though it was not as obvious as when on cans. Maybe the slowness of detail we both heard was due to not enough power to drive the cans? Inadequate USB power is an interesting proposition. Well. If there's another meeting sometime at Jaben you're coming to, let me know. Can drag my lappy with me to see whether the 'not enough juice' theory holds or not.

nope, direct connect..

currently the only amp in my hand is the go-vibe ppk. i have a silver cable and vdh interconnect to go along with it.
well i wont be arnd for some time, i believe my bro is comin back to kl in another week? u might want to catch his unit instead.
anyways im using a different usb 2.0 cable with twin input as of now. there's also the possibility the caps took sometime to charge because of the low usb power, or it was off for sometime already, so need to build charge.
I didnt really notice the smearing we heard before on tubular bells.

so i'll be running it thru a day with my old hd201 and see what happens tonight.
later when i do have time i'll be putting it to the merciless test of the 300ohm HD650 + Symphonica, it will show all flaws without reservation

seems like i'll be keeping this DAC after all. the low end weight and sound body is very nice.

---

Added on October 7, 2010, 8:36 amoh chchyong89.. just kinda itchy, no offence here but..
this is for you..


=)