EMPIRE CITY @ Damansara Perdana/Mutiara Damansara, Mixed Development Project in Damasara KL
|
|
 Mar 16 2016, 07:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
86 posts Joined: Jan 2005 
|
QUOTE(8sg9ft @ Mar 15 2016, 03:59 PM) Is there even a preceding court case of this type of dispute? I heard the same thing about the architect as well but can't verify. Anyone tried a SSM check on the firm?I heard some people say the architect is in-house. Is it true?  This post has been edited by neoexcaliber: Mar 16 2016, 07:30 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 16 2016, 10:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
86 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(aspartame @ Mar 16 2016, 10:02 AM) I thought Letter of Demand is for demand of payment of debt? How is it applicable here? Probably wrong choice of word. It should be a demand letter in this case and not a 'letter of demand'. |
|
|
Mar 16 2016, 05:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
86 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(JustNobody @ Mar 16 2016, 04:59 PM) No wonder now so many same type of projects (under commercial title) around klang valley... Heard Selangor accept no more SOHO, SOVO type of project now... Good thing? SOHO is protected under the HDA. The popular pseudo-SOHO nowadays is SOFO, SOVO. Next it'll be SOZO, SOTOng.  |
|
|
Mar 21 2016, 07:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
86 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
You guys make it sound as if that guy went up the building all by himself and looked for an empty unit without any representative accompanying him. It's either Mr Lim misheard about the mock unit or the rep brought him to the wrong floor. I'm not talking about intention here.
This post has been edited by neoexcaliber: Mar 21 2016, 07:07 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0418sec
 0.64
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 04:13 PM |
Quote