me too.....only with these public forces this type of " bulldoze  everything" dev can be exposed and punished

there is only one reason that so many people are being victimsed and people's hard earned money is being throw into the river

GREED....look at their cars, assets , lifestyles...etc etc all in the expense of these pityful victims

on a side note....THE MAIN hand behind this is the Selangor govt that so many of u voted
without the local authority cover up the dev will never escape all these

without local aouthority and selangor govt approvals and ccc....the dev habis liau
and the authority has every reason to do so
the dun is the PKR lady lah....mayb gd friend of dev also
best person to expose to is UMNO govt/Fed govt

a) From what i see is, that not his unit but all the reminders from developer is to his email add... looks weird...

b) As i got the news from my frn, Mr Lim took construction lift (which is the lift including the 3 lvls of podium floor), means if unit is in 18th floor.. 18+3 = 21 floor. If passenger lift (not including the 3 lvls of podium floor), of course press 18th floor no prob. ** not many people knows the difference of construction lift and passenger lift **

c) Related back to (B), means that is not the actual unit & floor. Obviously he went to wrong floor, aiks! 

I'm not helping any side, just as profession practice architect here. Need to correct something if that possible is cause all these happened

funny hor.
6.2. why does one needs permission to enter a development that has been VP'ed (albeit in stages/components)?
6.4. notice the key word used was renovation. meaning it must be completed before undergoing renovation. does it looks like it's completed and VP'ed as per building plans? hhmmmmm.
6.5 mentioned block e so it's assumed entire block e is vp'ed? common area covers a vast area. if there are items under common area not complete, then technically block e cannot get cpc. eg. facade is common area. so long there's opening or windows not fixed, it's still incomplete. so, question is are there any common area that is not complete that can void the certificate?

just saying yo!

I think VP and TOP is something similar.
But the arguing point is whether the entire building  has already obtain CCC?
If CCC still yet to be issued  by the architect / engineer, it still consider as construction site.
As early someone has shared that this is commercial unit and it is stated in the SPA that it can VP without CCC.
That the reason this topic is getting  hotter and hotter because of unethical developer, architect n engineer.

so it is different ah

In this case CCC is it same as CSC in singapore ?

Sharing is Caring this i understand, when i try to share those in correct things... Hows the outcome? KENA FLAME.

kinda disappointed actually.

From the day i start read it, 70% is just want to join the happening but has no balls like LIM