Where is the source of this news ? Can provide link ?

Question is whether they are top officials or recovery personnel. Wonder why need police if they dont anticipate resistance?

Extend additional facility would be like stepping further into the muddy field esp in current rising NPL environment. Ambank more like closing water tap mood now after bnm fine and major shareholders rumoured to be seeking buyers.

ES is doing well after the initial hiccup.

But when owners got the key for the unit, the similar hiccup they faced, just on smaller scale compared to Empire Damansara. It seems that now whatever the owners faced in Empire Damansar it is minuscule compared to Empire City. 

Everyone was using the success in Empire Subang, suck up the developer's inefficacy in delivering the product  and bbb in Empire Damansara and Empire City with the hope developer is able to replicate the success.

The edge weekly carries the news that ambank top officials visited empire city recently. MEH have outstanding loan of RM 900 mio with Ambank. Now the big guys are worried too.

Today a big group of police officers gather in front of empire city entrance , not sure what kinda investigation they doing there

u got take pict 

or anyone took one 

Were the presence of police related to bank official?
Few banks will write off rm900m without restructuring. The question is how many times have ambank restructured meh facility.

「或許，這是 last post for empire city」

為了公正和負責的 po 文，以下是今天我想寫的事實：

在 3 月 17 號的時候，當我還是十分堅信自己在 12 號看到的是 100% 真實，因此在 17 號的晚上，我去了 YB 林立迎在甲洞的 DAP 辦公室。

YB 委託 Mr Pui 為我們處理 Empire 的疑問，根據 Mr Pui 所說，Empire 的其中一位老闆，是他的中學同學。Mr Pui 說，他能帶我們進去 Empire City 以作實地考察。由於之前的經驗和不少 owner 分享的經驗，即使有鑰匙的，還是要 make appointment 過後才能進入 empire city。為此，Mr Pui 還說有 VP 的屋主其實是可以進入的，否則我們應該報警。由於我並不是 empire 的其中一位 owner，因此我懇求 Mr Pui 帶我進去。Mr Pui 豪氣的說：why not？

過後，我要求 Mr Pui 帶我們每一層已經得到 VP 的走走。

今天 10 點早上，我們到達 empire city 後，卻不被允許進入，理由是我們（包括一些有 VP 的 owner，有鑰匙的 owner，Mr Pui 和我）沒有 make appointment。請允許中間省略 Mr Pui 和 security guard 的對話。

然後，Mr Pui 唯有致電於發展商。發展商二話不說派來了一個代表，雖然我們也等了不少時間，但是最後我們也能進入 empire city 的 site office 了。

在 site office 探討了一下過後，發展商便帶我和我的朋友上去我朋友的單位，說當天他的伙計帶錯了。

有如圖片所見，單位內算是 practically completion，雖然有 defect。單位外或許有些善後工作。我在發展商允許拍照的範圍內拍下了以下的照片。但是不被允許走去逃生的樓梯。發展商說基於安全理由，我不能走出去。

因此，我在看完之後，就下去了。

在此，我對發展商和 architect 道歉。由於之前去錯地方（發展商的人帶錯路），而引起不少風波。

在回到發展商的辦公室後，我只有幾個問題：
1. 發展商的 VP 是怎麼定義？
2. 已經得到VP 的 owner 為何只能通過 appointment 進入？
3. 幾時能夠拿到 ccc？
4. 什麼叫做 pratically completion？

還有一個問題，就是為何當初發展商的伙計說帶我們去看 mock up unit ？對於此事，發展商的代表表示不知情。

在 Mr Pui 不能自由進入（empire city）後到最後幫發展商協調，問所有業主一個很關鍵的問題：你們在意 property 的 value 嗎？

我知道，我一直說下去，對你們的 value 也不好。雖然你們可能會質疑我今天有沒有去錯樓面（因為之前的照片），但是我想說：只有所有 block E 的人團結一致才能知道答案。

如果你是 block E 的 owner 而還有質疑，可以 PM 我你的資料。在某個人數後，我會有下一步。

DAP 的 Mr Pui 能夠幫的不多，你們不接受的話就要靠自己。

如果不信，PM 我。
否則，到此為止，我累了。

p/s will translate to English later.
*為了負責，之前的 po 隱藏了。

#記得爭取自己的幸福和利益

Quote TheStar: "DIBS, on the other hand, are a “willing seller-willing buyer” SPA cunningly crafted by developers and are in contradiction with the current housing legislation. Under the DIBS, the house buyer has agreed to be responsible to the banks/financial institutions for the loans signed under the SPA whether the houses are delivered or not. This is the moral hazard the Government is trying to prevent the house buyers from getting into."

http://www.thestar.com.my/business/busines...e-house-buyers/

These people signed the S&P already, be thankful the project is not abandon, if it is, you are liable for the loan towards the bank.

Good luck.

what bs is this
buyers have to be thankful if dev dont abandon the project....lol.....joke of the century...

BS? u tell your Lim Guan Eng loh. He wants the gov to bring back DIBS.
and be thankful? of course, what else? pray they go kaput?
You know, you lost the 'rape' debate. Stop picking on me and move on you cry baby.