QUOTE(akachester @ Oct 22 2010, 02:57 PM)
Well, at the moment, i do have a 500D with the Tammy 1750 NonVC and i do love it. Tested my cousin's D90 with 18-105 and i found it to be quite good. Especially love the range offered. Am trying to make sure the extra 1k here is worthy or not. I mean, i do love the 18-105 as a start (i never used any Nikon before) but just making sure at around the same range, whether there is any other lens that is about the same price and more worthy. Well, at least i am trying to see whether i would skip the 18-105 for the Tammy 1750 again cause it has been serving me quite well on a Canon. The problem with the Tammy for me is that i at times, need to constantly switch to a tele and this is where the 18-105 is very attractive.
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Oct 22 2010, 03:02 PM)
I thought of getting the D7k body only and pair with the Tammy 17-50mm VC version. I drop the extra range of 18-105 as I already hav a zoom lens, no point getting it, and the F2.8 of tammy performs much better at low light =)
D7k with 17-50mm 2.8 VC... sound sweet enough for most daily shoot.
i seldom need anything beyond 50mm and most of my picture was using my 10-20mm sigma, i shoot landscape and close-up landscape most of my time.
so, it really depend how you judge it... some enjoy 18-200mm or 18-270mm, some shoot with just a 18-55mm kits lens and get great result.
if your 17-55mm + tele lens setup serve you well in previous body why not get the same setup on your new cam.
as for Mr. akachester,
i think you are jumping from C to N... so, you can just start with the kits lens or without. Either way, you need to buy new lens for your Nikon body... as all you canon lens is useless to nikon body...
ready to burn a big big big hole in your pocket!!