Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Latest News Nikon D7000, Nikon

views
     
kaigraphy
post Sep 24 2010, 08:00 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(a.ihsan @ Sep 24 2010, 07:16 AM)
for sports & extremes ; D300s (higher frame rate, more robust body, 51AF points)

for normal use like portraits and events; D7000 (better ISO quality and ISO ratings, smaller, cheaper, 39AF points is more than enough, lighter)

but it remains to be seen how close the D7000 comes to beating the D300s. the D7000 (in my opinion) has surpassed the 7D in all areas except video, but the 7D is the D300s's direct competition. So the D400 should beat the crap out of 7D  biggrin.gif
*
lol r u serious...

user posted image

d7k
user posted image


7d full metal vs d7k half metal
and the 7d 19 cross type vs only 9 cross type on the d7k
8 vs 6fps

not only in video lah other area also 7d win...of cause d7k also win in other area...both r good camera but to say d7k surpassed the 7D in all areas is kind of lol....probally d400 will beat the crap out of 7d but 7dII will win the crown back again...its a never ending war...I am however willing to say that the d7k beat the crap out of 60d which is what the d7k was meant to compete with...

This post has been edited by kaigraphy: Sep 24 2010, 08:03 AM
kaigraphy
post Oct 14 2010, 10:27 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
it means...

5d2 vs d700 = 5d2 ftw
7d vs d7k = 7d ftw
60d vs d7k = d7k ftw

the d7k will price very closely with the 7d I presume and stated @ shashiki around rm4k...and canon will attack by lowering the current 7d 4.5k price even more...damn you canon my 7d drop so fast bought it like shit expensive vmad.gif vmad.gif vmad.gif

seriously the 60d is an epic fail by canon when compared to the d7k...as canon have no way to go cause if give magnesium body it will actually become 7dm2 so they give it a stupid plastic body while solid its still like going backwards cause the model it replace the 50d have metal body...

Added on October 14, 2010, 10:33 am
QUOTE(freddy manson @ Oct 14 2010, 08:37 AM)
So....... D7000 is where? Semipro or what?
Hahaha lucu ooo belum smpai sini oredi banyak cingcong
*
probably prosumer??? like the 60d...cause the d300s =semi pro just like the 7d which canon say is pro hahaha...watch the video below

Added on October 14, 2010, 10:38 am
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Oct 14 2010, 02:51 AM)
D. 7D is a semipro body.. and in numerous reviews it is compared against the older 50D and D300s.
*
Canon consider the 7D a PRO model...which is good for me!!! tongue.gif


This post has been edited by kaigraphy: Oct 14 2010, 10:40 AM
kaigraphy
post Oct 15 2010, 08:15 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
ha! since d7k price so close to the 7d get the 7d! tongue.gif
kaigraphy
post Oct 15 2010, 11:08 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(kewlboy @ Oct 15 2010, 10:53 PM)
I think it should cost below 4k for body only, or else D300s gulung tikar.
*
1,199.95USD=RM3,704.25 <-- Belum tambah tax or malaysia boleh price lagi leh...
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7350...mera_Body_.html

price so close to d300s/7D confirm d7k will eat d300s sales...but if I were to buy I buy the 7d instead! tongue.gif

This post has been edited by kaigraphy: Oct 15 2010, 11:08 PM
kaigraphy
post Oct 15 2010, 11:30 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(KTCY @ Oct 15 2010, 11:16 PM)
Tell me. What so good about 7D ?
*
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=ST&f...post&p=36535988

unless the d7k is price much cheaper which I doubt...I say the 7d is a better buy...but I know lot off ppl love nikon and I have no problem with that...the d300s also around rm4k seem like kena ownez by the younger d7k in some areas...I'm just saying for me the d7k for rm4k is just 2 expensive as the 7d is drop so much already...but hey in the end you can buy whatever you want...
kaigraphy
post Oct 15 2010, 11:36 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(KTCY @ Oct 15 2010, 11:33 PM)
Your that post, and the end there already stated clearly what it should compete with.

And still no official price even from Nikon Malaysia. It's still too early to judge anything.
*
true...but If the price is close...then can compare...let's wait and see cause I am almost certain its close to 4k...k I'll wait to see the official announcement...
kaigraphy
post Oct 16 2010, 04:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(kewlboy @ Oct 16 2010, 01:36 PM)
We can somewhat guess the price difference using reference of USD:

D7000 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7350...mera_Body_.html USD1199.95

7D http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/6469...LR_Digital.html USD 1599.00 after discount

Roughly 400USD difference at launch price.
Considering the huge gap, obviously the cameras are targeting different range of customers.
So there's no point comparing them.

Edit:

Considering the price difference, and some give and take in the specs, I think d7000 is making quite an impression.
Especially the CF card slot of 7D, quite a turn-off IMO.

http://www.gorephoto.com/blog/2010/equipme...per-and-better/

In terms of price, D7000 and 60D would make better comparisons. However the winner is quite clear:

http://dancarrphotography.com/blog/2010/09...0d-vs-canon-7d/
*
I hardly call 400USD a huge gap....you are after all buying a thousand dollar worth of equipment...wait till the MALAYSIA OFFICIAL price then we will know for sure...

This post has been edited by kaigraphy: Oct 16 2010, 04:23 PM
kaigraphy
post Oct 16 2010, 04:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(ComradeZ @ Oct 16 2010, 04:27 PM)
imho go for FF body, no?
*
yeap will be upgrading when the next gen FF 1dsm4 5d3 d800 d4/d4x out, c which the best then buy...but ff its like rm4k diff from 7d so quite expensive but if got money of cause go ff loh...
kaigraphy
post Oct 16 2010, 05:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(ComradeZ @ Oct 16 2010, 05:13 PM)
i tot the diff interm of body alone... is about 2k oni from 7d and 5dmii ?
*
went and search and found out around 2.6-3k not a lot but its still money to some ppl as you still need to get lens unless you have already...so if you have the money go ff unless you want to shoot sport then 7d...
kaigraphy
post Oct 17 2010, 07:32 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(jloi @ Oct 17 2010, 07:17 AM)
nikon d7000 noise sample..pretty impressive..i feel like selling off my D60 adi biggrin.gif

http://nikonrumors.com/2010/10/15/nikon-d7...so-samples.aspx
*
since many here r nikon lover I can understand why the hope that those high iso image are true...but its not the truth...he did say "they are so good that I even question the authenticity of those images"...some of those high iso image even win d3s which because its 12mp handle high iso relatively well...

Anyway here's a REAL mini review...

http://robertbromfield.com/nikon-d7000-rev...nd-impressions/

don't view unless you want 2 pixel peep! and you won't be happy with the result... rclxs0.gif
100% ISO 6400
Manual
Nikon 14-24mm at f8
Shutter: 1/40
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


he state:
QUOTE
Pros

    * The D7000 does deliver in a being a better auto focus performer than the D90.
    * The D7000 has a much needed contrast boost in the images.
    * The high ISO performance is better than the D90 but less than the D700, a good compromise.
    * Increased dynamic range versus other Nikon DX cameras.
    * Definitely better auto exposure metering compared to the D90.

Cons

    * The sharpness of images are definitely an issue.
    * Mushy shutter release button.
    * Peripheral auto focus points that are not the most sensitive in low light situations.
hmmm....according to him "The sharpness of images are definitely an issue." perhaps he pixel peep lol...

result does not look good for the d7k...so now last thing is wait for the official RM price...

This post has been edited by kaigraphy: Oct 17 2010, 07:49 AM
kaigraphy
post Oct 17 2010, 02:12 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(theotherhalf @ Oct 17 2010, 09:02 AM)
he he.. someone working so hard to promote 7D here.. 

keep it up bro...  but no offence,  one thing i don't understand, since you are so proud with the 'really' good Canon yours, why does it make a big deal when other manufacturer produce another good camera ?
what ever it is , D7k will certainly be another top selling camera from Nikon...    and 7D will be a just another good camera of the past( so were  d300 and d300s) ...  and it's price will sure drop more in the future

ps : i'm sure i'm not the only one who read Nikon rumors almost everyday... there are review and sample image which are stunning ...

arghhh ... this waiting game is killing me ...  any news on local distributor / seller who able to get the d7k yet... ??
*
not promoting anything...voice opinion got lah... you can buy whatever you want...

just want to show the even nikon with its increasing sensor size on a aps-c = noise when pixel peep same with canon just that ppl alway say that d3s = night king when in fact the small 12mp on a big cmos censor...when nikon go up in megapixel same case also, pixel peep = lot's of noise....but worst yet is that he mount that on tripod and shoot f8 the pic still blur 1... rclxub.gif
kaigraphy
post Oct 18 2010, 07:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(kewlboy @ Oct 18 2010, 02:54 PM)
Mounting it on a tripod and shooting at F8 =/= guaranteed sharp.
What about wind and moving subject?

I'm no Nikon fanboy, but the way the he reviewed D7000 is obviously via comparison with his more superior and expensive D700.
In the end he even put up his favorite night city skyline picture to undermine d7000, instead he could have posted a similar picture of this house taken at high ISO to make a stronger point.

Just my 2cents.
*
wind? r u serious...its not windy lah and at f8 should be sharp...he's shooting a house how can move have you even read it...
kaigraphy
post Oct 18 2010, 11:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(KTCY @ Oct 18 2010, 11:41 PM)
^
Tripod can't shake meh ? doh.gif
*
errrr...he's not a noob photographer doh.gif a tripod main function is to stabilize shot and he never mention his tripod was in danger of being shaken by the element and he's not really using a really long telezoom...even if it did shake the tripod more then likely he would have retook the shot as he's not a noob doh.gif

you know what maybe you can ask him directly on his web site as I am not stupid enuf to tel him he's not aware of a his tripod shake lol...
kaigraphy
post Oct 21 2010, 01:16 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
the d7k got pixel issue???....wakakakakakaka....

This post has been edited by kaigraphy: Oct 21 2010, 01:19 AM
kaigraphy
post Oct 21 2010, 01:23 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(Kiki-Lala @ Oct 21 2010, 01:19 AM)
So? Wanna show how great is your 7D? Fanboy indeed a fanboy. Guess you're just spamming around to gain post count.
*
relax dude I'm not insulting the d7k lol....is wakakakaka insulting lol...I'm going to read the pixel issue with great insterest and I'm not was suggesting you should not buy it....you can buy whatever you want wakakakaa....

This post has been edited by kaigraphy: Oct 21 2010, 01:24 AM
kaigraphy
post Oct 21 2010, 10:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
465 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
Added on October 21, 2010, 10:41 pm
QUOTE(KTCY @ Oct 21 2010, 08:30 AM)
unker ian jump in flex.gif
In fact his post 99% pointless and his post should be muted whistling.gif

btw to all those waiting so long, I will be checking out with my friends. hope to bring you guys some good news wink.gif
*
I know my post are pointless so why you read them lol...me muted...just because you can't discuss and can't counter fact presented by others properly you shut the other party out lol...nice job pal!!

Added on October 21, 2010, 10:43 pm
QUOTE(ianho @ Oct 21 2010, 08:21 AM)
Mr kaigraphy, you better stop your nonsense. This is a Nikon thread and no one wants to hear your daily dose of Canon nonsense. Know how to read? Read this- NO FANBOYISM ALLOWED! Capische?

Consider this a warning. Continue and you can pack your bags for a holiday.
*
unless you can point me to which post = fanboyism I consider this an invalid warning...c'mon show me where and I'll stop....

Added on October 21, 2010, 10:45 pm
QUOTE(chobo @ Oct 21 2010, 06:58 PM)
whao... cheaper than what i expected... even d300s used to be 5.9 when first launch...
*
already rm4k unlesss significantly cheaper imho they are better camera close to this price range....since lowyat so ISA have to refeain from expressing opinion not dim valid by the power to be in lowyat...sad but true...

Added on October 21, 2010, 11:02 pm
QUOTE(a.ihsan @ Oct 21 2010, 03:42 AM)
latest scoops on the D7000 and related Nikon news

http://nikonrumors.com/2010/10/20/bh-start...kits-today.aspx

http://nikonrumors.com/2010/10/20/nikon-in...kor-lenses.aspx

Added on October 21, 2010, 7:29 am

it does seem like the issue with the D7000 made your ego jump off everywhere. "wakakaka isn't insulting", but saying that after "D7k got pixel issues" pretty much is. if you didn't have any problem with the issue, you wouldn't have made such comment. anyways, have fun with your 7D, awesome camera with the 2 factory machines in there  smile.gif
*
hmmmm you need to read carefully d7k got pixel issue is stated by some1 else...I just ask only with a question mark??? you got to look properly...
QUOTE(Kiki-Lala @ Oct 20 2010, 02:31 PM)
yeah, saw alot of people complained about the pixel issue in nikonrumours forum.
*
Added on October 21, 2010, 11:07 pm
QUOTE(nairud @ Oct 21 2010, 10:16 AM)
Kai

If i dont post in Photography section, it doesn't mean i am not reading all the posts in here. I've seen your insinuating remarks in Canon thread and now you want to come into Nikon threads to create problems?

One more nonsense post from you and i will treat you well to a nice holiday spa
*
unless you consider laughing it off as insulating remark which it is absolutely not... as I have insulted nobody your warning is gag order lol...why would you kindly point me to my so called "insulating remark" and I'll happily stop...

This post has been edited by kaigraphy: Oct 21 2010, 11:16 PM
« Next Oldest · Photography, Digital Imaging & Video · Next Newest »
 

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0350sec    1.06    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 09:00 PM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.