QUOTE(alpha_company @ Oct 14 2010, 02:51 AM)
NOT fair??? are u sure??
I think you should take a very very close look at the 60D's specs if you haven't.
Nikon D7000 VS Canon 60D
1. The nikon has partial
weather sealing and a partial
Magnesium alloy body which the canon DOES NOT have.
2. 39 point VS 9 point on the canon
3. DUAL SD slots vs only one on the canon.
4. Extended ISO of 25600 vs 12800 on the canon.
Conclusion :
A. The D7000 can be considered to be a top amateur body or somewhere between top amateur & semipro.
B. The new 60D is the replacement model of the semipro 50D but the new 60D it is in a completely different class (not semipro class anymore).
C. D300s is a semipro body. Correct. 60D is a semipro body? WRONG.
D. 7D is a semipro body.. and in numerous reviews it is compared against the older 50D and D300s.
E. 7D is in the league of semipro crop sensor bodies as do the D300s. Their fullframe semipro counterparts would be the 5DmkII and D700.
u make me even more pening~!!

according to u, D7000 is top amateur body.
then mention 60D not semi pro class anymore.
then ur above point u list is both body from different world? top amateur body VS top semi pro body? isnt dat is not fair??
if u want to said review by others, ive seen D90 had been compared with 5dmk2 for term of low ISO. is D90 rival to 5dmk2? why there review between both of them?
my point is, review sux~! always bullshtting people. i care or read the spec on paper it got mag body, carbon fiber ke, can go to moon or even can snap in the blackhole. all i care is the quality of end result.
btw, the comparison ive made actually depends on price. didnt track price so might have mistake