I am doubtful of the admiral story. It does not go in hand with the subterran dwellers being driven there by another race. If they were driven there then this entry/exit should be easily located. It would not be like the admiral described.

Talking about the admiral again (since I have not read that much yet). He said, he could not describe the leader as he was not like anything seen on earth. He did not say the same about the two being who escorted him to the leader. So there is only one being that is one of a kind. The rest are the same.

The leader is also talking rubbish. He had chosen the admiral for the task. The leader is not that well verse with our human behaviour although he did he claimed that he had been watching us humans. Why did he choose an admiral who will be treted as a nut case? He did mentioned to the admiral that the leaders of earth had not heed their warnings yet what makes him think that an admiral could be more convincing?

I reject the admiral's records as there are too many inconsistency.

Actually, I thought the admiral was on LSD It was common during their time. If it was today, he will be on ice.

What is the purpose of someone making up the story, Robert? Why must they make it up on the admiral's behalf. They could use anyone else.

Hollow sphere are easier to spin. Just spin a baseball and compare it with a tenis ball. Just because it is easier to spin hollow spherical object does not necessary means spinning sphearical objects are hollow.

This post has been edited by faceless: Sep 15 2010, 03:57 PM

How did Halley realised the magnetic poles were constantly moving. During the 1700s what device did he use to determine that? Did his realisation come form mere speculation?

The people circumnavigate the world those days. Hailey probably heard the account from sailors that compass needles goes haywire when they approach the north and south pole. Sometimes is happens earlier and other times it happens later. He forgot a minute (1/60 degrees) at the center of the earth becomes an arc 1 nautical mile in length on the surface. There must be some margin of error for something of this size.

I think that if there was another magnet of different polarity just below each other we would have serious problems since this magnet is attached to the soil of our earth. It will not be as simple as compass needles going haywire. I think I will reject Halley's speculation or realisation.

This post has been edited by faceless: Sep 15 2010, 04:29 PM

I think this statement is as good as the statement that the earth is hollow.

How did the dust start clumping to each other? Earth is so dusty but there are no giantic dust ball floating around.

I think we need to keep an open mind. We should not discredit hollow earth from the precpective of a widely accpeted theory. We should discredit it from looking at inconsistencies from within itself.

I may have misunderstood you. Likewise you misunderstood me too. For that matter, I dont think anyone understood the TS either. I beileve the TS started this thered because he was doubtful of certain things about hollow earth theory at the same time there are things he considered having merit. He wanted to hear what we could or could not accept and why so that he can formulate his own standpoint. As it is this theread started of with sarcasm accompanied by a simple statement of disbelief (typical of PhD School - heading toward Kopitiam soon). The funny part is frictional movies were quoted as if these movies had more merit than the hollow earth theory. The more crude remarks the forum throw at TS, the more cut and paste he produced.

As an arts student, I admit my science is not that good. What I can see is the stuff TS produce have their points when they challenge what is "acceptable science" (by acceptable science I means ideas that nobody in these forum dispute. Seriously, even Hawkins dont makes sense to me). Both sides have different views of gravity. I wonder how many of you realise the inconsistencies you have brought out just to disagree with this theory.

Lets me ask what I put in bold. Since everything has gravity, why are there no dust ball floating around now. How often do you clean your room? I am sure there is still dust every day. Why only during formation of suns and plantes they can clump together but not now? Since you say the center has the strongest gravity why are humans not suck in to it to form the clump? There should be one center and it should be all powerful to suck all to it thus forming one big clump not little clumps here and ther and finally orbiting around it.

Robert,
Dont you think one day we will end up like kopitiam if we continue to hurl insults just because someone come up with a fairy tale that strongly offends your belief?

Cherroy,
My point is just because something that is in main streem science does not mean it does not have its inconsistencies. Why is earth gravity not pulling more dust now to make earth dustless and bigger? How come it had the ability to do such thing when it was only a spec of dust (much weaker than now a giantic globe that house you and I) but not now? So there is this statement "become a steady state" whcih sounded good and every one accpect and it become main stream science. What happen to the earlier premise that every thing has gravity. It is not workable now. It uses gravity to maintain the sytem. It sounds like a fairy tale to me. It seems okay at that time (due to our existing knowledge) so we accept it. Those days you say the earth is round and you get mocked. Now you are a cookoo if you say the eath is hollow. An acceptance due to no opposition at that time will become main stream science. To put it in another way, "it must be true because it is not faillable". That is science? Or to put in TS words, wait till Hawkins tell you otherwise then you will accept. I wonder how many of those who previously said "I will believe if I see it for myself" will just accept Hawkins without even seeing.