There are just too many twists and bends you need to make to current science, too many assumptions you need to take and on top of it, there is no evidence to show the hole exists. There are just wild speculations, what-ifs and pseudo science. I read this hollow earth theory like 10 years ago in another forum and thought that I would never see it again, but what a surprise.

Here is another such theory, maybe you should take a look at it as well.

Here is a description of Hanns Hoerbiger's Cosmic Ice Theory,

This is the story of a remarkable cosmology concocted by an Austrian
mining engineer, Hanns Hoerbiger. Hoerbiger was not only a mining
engineer, he was an amateur astronomer. Often, he would use a small
telescope to look at assorted celestial bodies, especially the Moon.
According to his account, early in this century, as he was looking at
the Moon, he was struck by the apparent brightness of its surface. He
had his first "recognition," that what he was seeing was ice, piled up
in blocks, producing the brightness and roughness he saw. Some nights
later, he had a dream and his second "recognition." He dreamt that he
was suspended in space, watching the swinging of a silvery pendulum,
which grew longer and longer until it broke. "I knew that Newton was
wrong and that the force of gravity stops at three times the distance
to Neptune," he concluded. This was the starting point for his Cosmic
Ice Theory.


This theory he worked out, in collaboration with a schoolteacher named
Philipp Fauth, in a giant book called {\it Glazial-Kosmogonie}. Here
is what it said: Once upon a time, there was a supergiant star in the
direction of the constellation Columba. A smaller star, dead,
water-soaked to the core, fell into it. It was heated up, vaporizing
the water, and causing a great explosion. The fragments of this
smaller star were spewed out of the supergiant into interstellar
space. The water condensed out into ice, forming giant ice blocks. A
ring of this ice formed, as well as a small number of solar systems.
This ring is known to us all as the Milky Way. Among the solar systems
that formed was our own, with many more planets than exist today.

This post has been edited by SpikeMarlene: Sep 14 2010, 07:55 PM

How would a hollow earth with an inner sun formed in the first place? What is the critical mass before a lump of matter becomes a shining sun? How would an inner sun this small maintain equilibrium in the center as the earth rotates wobbly on it's own axis and around the sun in an elliptical orbit while the moon is pulling? Why water falling in the openings to the hollow earth not pull towards the center of gravity where the inner sun is? How would a weather system form since the inner sun is always shinning at presumably constant temperature?

This does not follow. What hawking stated, as i understand it, means unification of existing laws of nature. This unification is a great thing because it brings us closer to the fundamentals of nature, it gives a better picture what reality is. So as we probe deeper into nature, some events display disturbing behavior that seems to suggest some manner of randomness or arbitrariness. It does not mean we would not know how earth is born. There are many evidences that support the current theory how earth was made. The problem you have is it does not support a hollow earth.
There is a critical mass required before a lump of matter ignites into a shinning sun. Otherwise you would see saturn or jupiter shinning like a smaller sun but you don't. For the earth and other planets to rotate around the sun, that means gravitationally these planets are falling into the center of gravity all the time, but they keep missing it all the time too. So the theory of hollow earth can be resolved easily, because you need a mini sun to shine for at least millions of years, earth to rotate furiously around the mini sun that is inconsistent with it's current rotation, an escape velocity much smaller than what we know today that somewhat prevents matter from falling directly into the inner sun. So where are the calculation and evidence?

Unless of course you invoke magic or arbitrary unknown laws of nature, which then makes this theory a wild speculation wouldn't it?

I see no light emanating from the hole if there is a inner sun within. Sometimes I wonder if there is really a hole why it is so difficult just to take direct unambigious pictures of huge bright lights pouring forth into the night sky from ground below. It should be visible at night hundreds of kms away .... Oh, the hole covers itself up at night

This post has been edited by SpikeMarlene: Sep 18 2010, 05:17 PM

That must have been long in coming, with references dated as far back as as nearly a hundred years. Where is the evidence say within these 10 years? Why it is so difficult to get direct evidence of a hole as big as a state? Maybe because it does not exist? That would simply explain why after all these years, it still remains alive only on paper and web pages.

To get evidence on the hollow earth theory and a gaping hole as big as a large city on earth, you need to go to saturn or jupiter to take some pictures? Amazing!

The flat earthers would go for the throats of hollow earthers and we should let them slug it out. You can't have flat and hollow at the same time. It will be entertaining to watch.

It can, with the inner sun smacked right at the flat pancake center. How thick you want the pancake to be? so that the inner sun does bulge out too much

The art is don't think so much, it may be fun to read if you do so.

All these dubious psuedo-science hypothesis or wild speculations have disappearing tricks built-in. They only give tantalizing hints, bits and peices to bait your interest, so when you look really hard at it, it disappears, to be replaced by some other tantalizing hints. So it lures you round and round, fuel your curiosity but as we are all frequently in need of coffee shop small talks, some are addicted hardcore forumers, this is not too bad a diversion. What if hollow earth is actually designed by some advanced space alien, seeded some low scumbag lifeforms on it's surface but after millions of years, evolve into pesky human!

But the problem is not one UFO sighting can be conclusively shown to be real. Most of them are not and some of them with inconclusive findings are left to the wide interpretation of anyone who really took a closer look at these reported cases. Again it appears as if UFO is on just as shaky ground as the hollow earth theory.

You meant that quran has a theory for hollow earth? Or quran has a theory for night and day?

Great quote!