Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 led tv with motion interpolation, which is good deal?

views
     
TShansapkuay
post Sep 12 2010, 08:38 PM, updated 16y ago

Casual
***
Junior Member
300 posts

Joined: Sep 2006


samsung had its motion plus, sony with motion flow?
any other opinion? is it ok to run this technology on normal sd video?pros and cons?
budget is around rm4k,if can below
tvrosak
post Sep 15 2010, 01:26 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
11 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(hansapkuay @ Sep 12 2010, 08:38 PM)
samsung had its motion plus, sony with motion flow?
any other opinion? is it ok to run this technology on normal sd video?pros and cons?
budget is around rm4k,if can below
*
Both are good and both also have options of 100hz and 200hz.

This extra motion interpolation feature is to make the picture motion smoother and sometimes pleased to our eyes.
SD or HD shouldn't be a problem.
I would recommend the feature for watching HD sports channel, especially football or any other fast action games but not for movies.

There are a lot to explain, but I just give brief ones;

Sports
We usually want to see the sportsmen action/movement in details. e.g. how the player make the kicks or flicks, how is the golfer does his swing.


Movies
We don't actually need motion interpolation, this feature would make your movie lose the dramatic effects. You do not need to see every minutes movement details. Because the movies director had already have this in mind, if he wants you to see movement detail. He would make slow motion picture. So you don't need motion interpolation in watching movies, disable it , and you would be watching the movie as the director wants to express his creative art.


I guess most of LED TV have this motion interpolation feature. All brand would do almost the same output. But don't leave this feature out if you are buying LED TV 40 to above. Because nowadays, broadcasting is using H.264 codec, this codec is a champion in motion blur.

p/s: ever wonder why manufacturer really push for motion interpolation. it's because of the H.264.

This post has been edited by tvrosak: Sep 15 2010, 01:27 PM
TShansapkuay
post Sep 16 2010, 09:34 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
300 posts

Joined: Sep 2006


yess!!!!!!!
at last i got a reply.i knew there's someone out there who knew about this.haha...
so,for 40 and below,there's no option for motion interpolation?
H.264 mostly used for mkv hd file rite?
so,it had good quality,but terrible motion
tvrosak
post Sep 20 2010, 09:06 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
11 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(hansapkuay @ Sep 16 2010, 09:34 PM)
yess!!!!!!!
at last i got a reply.i knew there's someone out there who knew about this.haha...
so,for 40 and below,there's no option for motion interpolation?
H.264 mostly used for mkv hd file rite?
so,it had good quality,but terrible motion
*
For TV below 40, only Sharp has one model of 100/120hz non FullHD TV. That the only model I've seen in the market so far. And that model is not in selling anymore.

Blu-Ray player also has H.264/MPEG-4 AVC codec as it is a latest requirement. But, Blu-Ray content has bigger bitrate compare to tv broadcasting.

The Blu-Ray doesn't suffer so much in motion blur, thanks to it high bitrate. But in technology sense, H.264/MPEG-4 AVC (MPEG-4 ver. 10) suffers more motion blur comparatively to baseline MPEG-4 (MPEG-4 ver. 1) codec.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0165sec    0.81    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 04:10 PM