Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 NVIDIA Graphics Card Overclocking V1, OC Your Card and Post Results Here

views
     
hafizul88
post Jan 19 2011, 08:43 AM

= Rebuilding =
******
Senior Member
1,430 posts

Joined: Jul 2009



May i ask a question. Before this i oc my GC until 870MHz and do folding. The temperature is about 55'c. Why when i reset back to normal, the temperature is still around that. hmm.gif
hafizul88
post Jan 19 2011, 11:01 AM

= Rebuilding =
******
Senior Member
1,430 posts

Joined: Jul 2009



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 19 2011, 10:44 AM)
Did u mean load temp is 55C for both OC and non OC?
need some proofs ie GPUZ and Afterburner to see.
Either u forgot to hit Apply button or ure talking about idle temp
*
That temperature was when i do GPU folding

user posted image


Added on January 19, 2011, 6:35 pmHi, just wanna share some of my benchies here

user posted image

This post has been edited by hafizul88: Jan 19 2011, 06:45 PM
hafizul88
post Jan 19 2011, 08:57 PM

= Rebuilding =
******
Senior Member
1,430 posts

Joined: Jul 2009



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 19 2011, 08:27 PM)
u forgot to upload folding with stock clock. I just wanna see issit also hitting 54C max @ 80% fan speed
*
Owh. Sorry bro. My bad

Attached Image
hafizul88
post Jan 19 2011, 09:48 PM

= Rebuilding =
******
Senior Member
1,430 posts

Joined: Jul 2009



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 19 2011, 09:27 PM)
U didn't increase the voltage, so the temp max out at the same point.  smile.gif
My GTX580SLI is OCed 785 to 880 w/o increasing volt the temps didn't change at load.
*
So it means that the temperature very much related with the voltage. Am i right?
hafizul88
post Feb 10 2011, 03:57 AM

= Rebuilding =
******
Senior Member
1,430 posts

Joined: Jul 2009



Before this I OCed my GTX460 until 870MHz. It gave me certain FPS while benchmarking. But when I OCed until 900MHz, it gives me FPS but lower than the 870MHz. I do pump up a bit of the voltage hmm.gif Does it means that the OC is not stable?

This post has been edited by hafizul88: Feb 10 2011, 04:04 AM
hafizul88
post Feb 10 2011, 04:09 AM

= Rebuilding =
******
Senior Member
1,430 posts

Joined: Jul 2009



QUOTE(saturn85 @ Feb 10 2011, 04:06 AM)
for the two 870MHz test, all hardware setting and clock are the same? unsure.gif
*
You mean the processor and ram clock all sort of things?
hafizul88
post Feb 10 2011, 04:12 AM

= Rebuilding =
******
Senior Member
1,430 posts

Joined: Jul 2009



QUOTE(saturn85 @ Feb 10 2011, 04:10 AM)
yes, and benchmark setting? unsure.gif
*
Yup. All the same. Do I need to run Furmark first before doing any benchmarking?
hafizul88
post Feb 10 2011, 04:23 AM

= Rebuilding =
******
Senior Member
1,430 posts

Joined: Jul 2009



QUOTE(saturn85 @ Feb 10 2011, 04:17 AM)
haha, this one i m not sure.
furmark is used for testing stability.
maybe you can stress it and make sure it is stable before running benchmark.
is the testing environment the same? any software interfere? unsure.gif
*
I closed all the running program before running the benchmark. Environment not the same since I ran benchmark during daytime before
hafizul88
post Feb 10 2011, 07:52 PM

= Rebuilding =
******
Senior Member
1,430 posts

Joined: Jul 2009



QUOTE(saturn85 @ Feb 10 2011, 04:27 AM)
haha, actually i mean OS environment.
but i don't know what happened there.
maybe got software interfere then lead to lower performance? unsure.gif
*
I'll try another shot.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0295sec    0.33    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 01:44 AM