chipset = BT-D43
Vdimm applied = 2.8V
system = Sempron (S-754)
Attached thumbnail(s)
SANDRA 2005 MEMORY OVERCLOCKING CHALLENGE, OVERCLOCKED MEMORY COLLECTION !!
|
|
May 7 2005, 11:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2005, 12:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
|
|
|
May 19 2005, 11:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
hippies, try to do 2.5-3-3-6@1T with 312mhz
@dinster it's a dt-d43, not bt-d43... i've changed my rams already This post has been edited by soulfly: May 19 2005, 11:56 AM |
|
|
May 19 2005, 05:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
|
|
|
May 30 2005, 12:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
erm... just want to give opinion
isn't that it's kinda unfair S-754 Athlon64 to be compared to S-939 Athlon64, coz the differences in performance of single channel and dual channel Athlon64 is quite obvious i think the category for amd should be divided to Socket A (Athlon/Athlon XP/Duron/Sempron) Socket 754 (Athlon64/Sempron) Socket 939/940 (Athlon64/Athlon64 FX) This post has been edited by soulfly: May 30 2005, 12:41 PM |
|
|
Jun 10 2005, 05:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 10 2005, 07:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
QUOTE(gsan @ Jun 10 2005, 07:25 PM) @ soulfly can. but limited to 250mhz with only 3.2Vdimmyour utt ch5 bought from powerslide,right? should be can run at 2-2-2-5. with 2-3-2-x, it allows me to go further without hurting the bandwidth so much. |
|
|
Jun 12 2005, 03:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
QUOTE(dinster @ Jun 12 2005, 12:48 PM) when i brought the 1st batch of OCZ VX, it was CH5 UTT, and the rated speed on sticker is 7-3-3-2.5 how come BH-5 runs at less tight timing compare to CH-5?but 1 of my customer (remysix) reported that his replacement Value VX from OCZ is now rated 8-4-4-2.5 (on the sticker) maybe that's the sign OCZ has moved to BH5 dies for VX Value ? |
|
|
Aug 23 2005, 02:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
|
|
|
Aug 25 2005, 06:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
antonio... the timing so bad one...
even 2.5-4-4-8 also cannot kah? maybe u just need more vdimm... jgn lokek oo, the ram is starving. make it 2.8-2.9V |
|
|
Aug 31 2005, 04:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
vascjw,
actually u can run 2.5-4-4-8 easily on bt-j try make it run at 1T ... no point running at 2T |
|
|
Sep 27 2005, 05:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
|
|
|
Oct 7 2005, 05:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
ah...the new good micron -5b d chips.... 1GB DDR600 goodness
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2005, 04:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
Behold the infamous OCZ EL TCC5
DDR626 result coming up! ![]() http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=42334 RAM = 512MBx1 OCZ EL PC3200 Plat. Rev. 2 1.1 chipset = Samsung TCC5 Vdimm applied = 2.9 V 1T OR 2T = 1T system = Sempron64 s754 CPU speed = 2504MHz Score = 4833 dinster.... pull me up! This post has been edited by soulfly: Oct 8 2005, 04:24 PM |
|
|
Oct 9 2005, 10:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
benchable... but not prime stable yet. still got room to play... maybe need fine tuning the memory timings
|
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 03:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
I think because since you are using 2 double sided modules, the bios automatically change the ram operation from 1T(CPC Enabled) to 2T(CPC Disabled) which theoretically reduce the bandwidth by almost half.
|
|
|
Oct 11 2005, 08:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
check the bios. i don't know which section... but it should be together with the memory timing settings. don't ask me further because i don't even know what motherboard u are using.
|
|
|
Oct 21 2005, 12:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
that's just SiSandra's glitch
|
|
|
Oct 23 2005, 04:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
Najmods, you should scroll down the sandra membench to show the ram timings and speed before you screencap it.
|
|
|
Nov 20 2005, 08:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
VIP
15,903 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Miri |
AFAIK, Hynix based RAMs works quite well with Intel
|
| Change to: | 0.0302sec
0.39
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 01:01 AM |