First AMD Bulldozer Benchmarks Leaked

actually it is the server base bulldozer, interlagos chips with 16 cores.

Don't hope on cheap prices from AMD already as they have brought back the FX series and most probably their top of the line 8 core processor will be very expensive..
I am expecting that 8 core to outperform current SB offerings but at the same time cost more than the Core i7 2600K as well..I doubt it will be priced on par or lower than Core i7 2600K just to compete with it

I know they are not aiming for the enthusiasts market like the LGA2011/LGA1366..LGA1366 might make sense because it is still cheap
If you scale the price of SB as mid range and SB-E as high end the SB-E would easily be somewhere 1k++ for the processor alone..
I've seen the list of features that SB-E has and I don't think AMD will sacrifice backwards compatibility for oversized socket and quad channel DDR3..
Bulldozer performance seems a little bit vague currently because AMD has not even released much info about it..
But from the architecture side it is actually a different approach than Intel's and 8 core is actually 4 modules which should equal 4 cores to Intel..
I will come to expect many would say that Intel's 4 core is superior to AMD's 8 core instead of looking at how it should be looked at..4 modules not 8 cores 
Even more so the Bulldozer module without the L2 cache has the same die space as a single SB core..so a module should be compared with Intel's single core
I am also waiting for the 6 core but AMD marketing team is stupid for making me and the whole market wait..
Llano will not enter the desktop market yet but it should aim for the laptop market first..E-350 low end laptops are going as cheap as some netbooks already

by seen that price system,can it fusion with dedicated graphic card like hybrid crossfire?

Those kind of videos are better taken with a grain of salt as the tests are made to show that Llano is better than SB..
In actual fact Intel's processor is actually a lot better compared to AMD's Stars but this test is loading more on the video and graphical based applications..
So actually this test is to show that AMD Llano can handle those multitasking loads as the video processing is offloaded to its GPU making the CPU handle other tasks..
The SB however has to handle all of the load on its own and no matter how powerful it may be..if you make any processor do all the work it will slow down
If Llano CPU portion is made to do all 100% of the workload in that test it will suffer about the same problems as well so the star of the show is the GPU..

Komodo is not APU, it is CPU.

AMD = Advance Multiple Delay!!!
Argghh

I think you may be a little confused.

The first gen bulldozer would run on AM3+ and is an FX series. The second gen bulldozer would run on FMx (FM1, FM2, FM3 and etc I presume) and is known as commodore. First gen bulldozer (zambezi) which runs on AM3+ is likely compatible with FMx motherboards, just like AM3 cpus are compatible with AM3+ motherboards. However, FMx bulldozer (commodore) is likely incompatible with AM3+ socket just as how the first gen bulldozer Zambezi wouldn't run on AM3 boards.

AMD's product line chart shows that FMx will be launched in 2012 but doesn't show that AM3+ will overlap FMx which leads me to think that AM3+ will be short lived (6-9 months or so). OTOH, Intel's Ivy Bridge WILL be backwards compatible with 1155 motherboards (some).

^ all PCI-E 2.0??
hope they come up with PCI-E 3.0 for more future proof.

plus, that xeon is been overclock. that bulldozer is still stock =.=!

I thought of the same thing as well  . Its because the site said its 8 core so I thought its 8 physical core, in the end, 4 cores / 8 thread  

Dirt3 on my i7 2600K HT + 3X GTX580 @ 2560x1600 ultra
it uses all the cores, but not all the threads