Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat

views
     
rav3n82
post Oct 12 2011, 03:16 PM

I find your lack of faith disturbing!
*******
Senior Member
7,084 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
From: Penang


QUOTE(Tom's Hardware)
But by the time it emerges for the enthusiast market, AMD will probably have to contend with Ivy Bridge, armed with advancements of its own. This isn’t a good thing. I want to see competition—a battle that keeps both Intel and AMD innovating. Does today’s FX invoke the Athlon 64 FX-51 that compelled Intel to rebadge a Xeon and come up with the Extreme Edition moniker back in 2003 just to compete? Not really, no. In fact, the chip giant didn’t have to do anything at all. Its nearly year-old 95 W parts fend for themselves without even a price adjustment.

Although I’m counting on Valencia and Interlagos to fare better against Xeon in the server space, where threaded workloads are the rule, it’s disappointing to see Zambezi suck down the power of Intel’s highest-end processors under load, perform like its competitor’s year-old mainstream chips, and wear the branding of a family that, eight years ago, actually made Intel squirm.
The sad but brutal truth. sad.gif
rav3n82
post Oct 14 2011, 09:40 AM

I find your lack of faith disturbing!
*******
Senior Member
7,084 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
From: Penang


I just noticed that prices (USD) for FX processors in Newegg appears higher than listed during release date. AMD shooting itself in the foot? hmm.gif

FX-8150: Eight cores, 3.6 GHz CPU base (3.9 GHz Turbo Core, 4.2 GHz Max Turbo), RM 882 (USD 279.99)

FX-8120: Eight cores, 3.1 GHz CPU base (3.4 GHz Turbo Core, 4.0 GHz Max Turbo), RM 693 (USD 219.99)

FX-6100: Six cores, 3.3 GHz CPU base (3.6 GHz Turbo Core, 3.9 GHz Max Turbo), RM 598 (USD 189.99)

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList....&name=FX-Series

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0483sec    0.42    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 11:41 AM