Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat

views
     
middels8088
post Jun 12 2011, 08:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(everling @ Jun 12 2011, 05:08 PM)
Very nice. More than enough performance for my needs, although it seems that the Bulldozer is less efficient than Sandy Bridge.
*
To be exact, the 2600K have a max TDP of 95W while the Bulldozer core have a max TDP of 186W...
middels8088
post Sep 26 2011, 07:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(Kizarh @ Sep 26 2011, 06:14 PM)
not just higher freq, higher TDP too lolz, 95W VS 125W, 2600K basically fighting handicapped. I don't have high hope on Bulldozer if Intel decide to slash price during they launch, Intel gonna hit Bulldozer real hard, but I liked Bobcat
*
Erm... Intel and AMD have their own ways in counting TDPs... biggrin.gif
middels8088
post Oct 15 2011, 12:26 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


QUOTE(bai1101 @ Oct 15 2011, 12:02 PM)
any one have result of fx4100 vs i3

interest to know since there in same price range
*
Here you go...
It does not show you a direct comparison between the 4100 vs the i3...
But you should really know that from the graph, its weaker than a Phenom II x4 980 black edition and sometimes even weaker than the a8-3850! cry.gif
middels8088
post Dec 1 2011, 01:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


Anyways, AMD still committed to x86, but not on high end desktop...

Linky



 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0430sec    0.86    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 05:13 AM