Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
|
middels8088
|
Jun 12 2011, 08:25 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(everling @ Jun 12 2011, 05:08 PM) Very nice. More than enough performance for my needs, although it seems that the Bulldozer is less efficient than Sandy Bridge. To be exact, the 2600K have a max TDP of 95W while the Bulldozer core have a max TDP of 186W...
|
|
|
|
|
|
middels8088
|
Sep 26 2011, 07:28 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Kizarh @ Sep 26 2011, 06:14 PM) not just higher freq, higher TDP too lolz, 95W VS 125W, 2600K basically fighting handicapped. I don't have high hope on Bulldozer if Intel decide to slash price during they launch, Intel gonna hit Bulldozer real hard, but I liked Bobcat Erm... Intel and AMD have their own ways in counting TDPs...
|
|
|
|
|
|
middels8088
|
Oct 15 2011, 12:26 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(bai1101 @ Oct 15 2011, 12:02 PM) any one have result of fx4100 vs i3 interest to know since there in same price range Here you go...It does not show you a direct comparison between the 4100 vs the i3... But you should really know that from the graph, its weaker than a Phenom II x4 980 black edition and sometimes even weaker than the a8-3850!
|
|
|
|
|
|
middels8088
|
Dec 1 2011, 01:27 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Anyways, AMD still committed to x86, but not on high end desktop... Linky
|
|
|
|
|