Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat

views
     
chetyin
post Jul 21 2011, 11:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: SABAH


QUOTE(dma0991 @ Jul 19 2011, 01:41 AM)
Not very easy to implement PCI-E 3.0 at this stage. Even Intel is having trouble with PCI-E 3.0 on their LGA2011 and there are rumors that the early version of LGA2011 boards will come with PCI-E 2.0 instead because implementing PCI-E 3.0 will delay them further till next year.
*
huh...
a Few z68 is going to implement pci-e 3.0...
even Asrock were making such board.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

thus i dun think there would be a problem to implement it onto the board.
not sure about LGA2011 though but the LGA2011 board is really complicated quad channel RAM really challenge the design of the board.

This post has been edited by chetyin: Jul 21 2011, 11:28 PM
chetyin
post Jul 22 2011, 02:42 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: SABAH


QUOTE(amirudin920927 @ Jul 21 2011, 07:46 PM)
maybe can stand for 2yrs,seems its 8core. nowadays also we can't even use all 6core for gaming,juz quad core only. more than quadcore used for graphics designing like rendering.

am i rite? if wrong pls correct me,i'm a noob. tq
*
Ppl still buy it for future proof.
If the price is cheap, wont hurt to have a few extra core. biggrin.gif

QUOTE(saturn85 @ Jul 22 2011, 03:37 AM)
8 core is good for folding, especially with -bigadv. brows.gif

more than quad core, can use for folding@home as well. brows.gif
*
saturn85, you too addicted to folding... tongue.gif
try SB-E 6core-12threads... drool.gif
chetyin
post Jul 22 2011, 05:31 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: SABAH


QUOTE(dma0991 @ Jul 22 2011, 04:51 AM)
Those boards are still a prototype when it debuted during the live event so it could just be a physical mock up of the board but not a working prototype. For a Z68 board to have PCI-E 3.0 makes not much sense since there are only 16 lanes coming from the CPU and split in configuration of x16 and x8x8.

Actually I think Intel does not have much of problem implementing it is just that if they are not 100% sure that it will definitely work then there is no point releasing it since it could be hardware dependent and firmware updates will not fix the problem in the future. It is all rumor and speculation at this moment and nobody is 100% sure what is going on behind closed doors.

I am guessing that Intel is playing it safe since the Cougar Point chipset bug and they wouldn't mind delaying a few months to make sure that their products work. Quad channel memory I think exists on server boards for quite some time already and it is now moving downwards to the consumer level products.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
ic...
Thx for the clarification.
quad channel are going to put a lot of challenges to those designer to put their heatsink where they use too. biggrin.gif
bulldozer, SB-E and IB what a interesting year a head. laugh.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0434sec    0.23    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 04:43 AM