Meh, I'll wait for 22nm Ivy Bridge instead. Getting itchy already.
AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
|
|
 Mar 9 2011, 08:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Elite
24,331 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2011, 12:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
24,331 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(yinchet @ Mar 9 2011, 10:45 PM) so fast Ivy Bridge edi meh?? Not yet. It's still a long wait. |
|
|
Oct 1 2011, 07:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
24,331 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur
|
Possibly another delay. Seems like 32nm is giving them problems
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-q3-20...ries,13559.html |
|
|
Oct 13 2011, 09:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
24,331 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur
|
Next year, AMD will be competing with Ivy Bridge 22nm with 3D transistors. It won't be easy.
|
|
|
Oct 15 2011, 08:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Elite
24,331 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Setapak, Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(billytong @ Oct 15 2011, 07:09 AM) The problem is even in multithreaded area, it is not much faster than the SB. It is only as good as SB. if they really want to win in this area, they probably should not use that large 16MB cache. They should have come out a 10-12 core base BD. Yeah, 2 billion transistors losing to 995 million from i7 2600K is not right. With the time they have, it should have been better. They probably need better engineers. But then again, SB is matured 32nm. It's not easy.Intel already has 10 core with HT for server. They can build for it desktop if they want. This post has been edited by TristanX: Oct 15 2011, 08:36 AM |
| Change to: |  0.0170sec
 0.57
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 01:12 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.