WTH
I wonder if there is a B3 revision
This is pathetic
But one thing I don't get is why some reviews actually show better results (almost on-par with i7 2600k) than others?
AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
|
|
Oct 12 2011, 07:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
422 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
WTH
I wonder if there is a B3 revision This is pathetic But one thing I don't get is why some reviews actually show better results (almost on-par with i7 2600k) than others? |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2011, 09:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
422 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
There might be a chance if AMD recalls all bulldozer processors and report that all of them are faulty and send in the real chips
|
|
|
Oct 12 2011, 09:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
422 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Oct 12 2011, 09:48 PM) It won't help. Why didn't AMD think of thatIt is very likely Intel's 2 core with HT will beat 4xxx & 6xxx out of water (considering it's already outperformed PhenomII x4 & x6 in many benchmarks). I think AMD should stop selling the crap of hex & octa -cores. She should have focused on developing 2 cores and 4 cores, with 50% better per-core-performance than Intel's. I think if Bulldozer was just 6 core at max with better performance worth those 2 cores, maybe it could make a dent on Intel's SB |
|
|
Oct 19 2011, 09:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
422 posts Joined: Mar 2010 |
So wait for B3 stepping
I knew there would be a B3 |
| Change to: | 0.0423sec
0.80
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 02:28 PM |