AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
|
|
 Sep 26 2011, 06:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004  
|
not just higher freq, higher TDP too lolz, 95W VS 125W, 2600K basically fighting handicapped. I don't have high hope on Bulldozer if Intel decide to slash price during they launch, Intel gonna hit Bulldozer real hard, but I liked Bobcat
This post has been edited by Kizarh: Sep 26 2011, 06:31 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28 2011, 02:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
Average user? they just buy OEM Desktop/Laptop like DELL HP ACER LENOVO etc.(pre-assembled no headacre
 ) which Intel platform dominate that part lolzQUOTE(Irishcoffee @ Sep 28 2011, 01:41 AM) steve jobs did it The former AMD CEO(Dirk Meyer) was a smart one, but he left AMD he is plying terran single base vs microsoft seven base during the past but now? look how apple turn tide of battle against microsoft during 2000s all amd need is a smart CEO   but at least with a life line which is graphic department and Bobcat cores. |
|
|
Oct 7 2011, 06:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(tech3910 @ Oct 7 2011, 03:07 PM) conclusion, it sucks on gaming..... Ain't good for console emulators lolz |
|
|
Oct 7 2011, 07:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(^KamilskaZ^ @ Oct 7 2011, 07:10 PM) most emulator for pc required high clock processor.thats for my experience no...it require high performance cores, emulation is single and very complex(Fermi can't handle this lolz) threaded |
|
|
Oct 9 2011, 06:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
Don't be so happy yet, if Intel decided to Slash price on their K-series CPUs on BD Launch, BD gonna get butt kicked REAL HARD, beside INtel CPUs is better when running console emulators like PCSX2(PCSX2 is very hurt CPU, especially if you emulate MGS2, Core I5 2500K at turbo speed still lag lolz)
|
|
|
Oct 9 2011, 06:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(izzat80 @ Oct 9 2011, 06:48 PM) hi bro ehhh I don't have Crash Nitro kart but the default setting will mostly do fine and I running Full clamping, extra...err forgot the name on VUs for maximum compatibility, software rendering(hurt CPU more lolz) can help on display accurate graphic as well but they don't as nice as hardware of coz as for plugins GSDX, lilypad, SPU2-X are best for mei try to run crash nitro kart on PS2 emulator was my fav game.. because now don have console.. do u know optimal settings? pls pm me if u r interested in sharing. anyway many times before i don care about prices i ask my friends what is best cpu when want to buy a new pc.. but now i don care intel. always go for amd the intel is almost always faster.. but how much extra need to pay for it? after a few times amd pay good price for cpu, then can save for gfx and others, now have brand loyalty amd dont care about intel anymore, because THIEF Nice try AMD, but I7 2660K still win, even I7 2600 still win lolz This post has been edited by Kizarh: Oct 9 2011, 07:00 PM Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2011, 08:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
Wow, metalbox? lolz
|
|
|
Oct 11 2011, 10:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(TDUEnthusiast @ Oct 11 2011, 08:46 PM) 10% drop in price I'd say, is rather ambitious They(Intel) sure capable if they want to lolz. |
|
|
Oct 12 2011, 04:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(lingloong @ Oct 12 2011, 04:15 PM) Not reseller/retailer set the price. You need go all the way back to AMD & distributor really bad word for AMD fanbois from a dealer lolz After going through the reviews, I also scare keep AMD stock  |
|
|
Oct 12 2011, 09:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(tech3910 @ Oct 12 2011, 06:54 PM) i'll leave this here. at least Fermi is superior than its competitor Radeon 6000 series, but Bulldozer fail to beat Sandy Bridge and bound to get killed by Ivy Bridge lolzthis is seriously how i feel about AMD now..... well, @ least the part about "bulldozer + fermi = electric bill would kill me" made my day.... |
|
|
Oct 13 2011, 10:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
They(AMD) never even look into software developers side of story, no many of them(Software devs) will actually bothered scratch their head to rewrite the softwares to from few thread (1-4) to many threads lolz, same goes to their graphic department
 |
|
|
Oct 13 2011, 10:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
CPU ain't equal to GPU, CPU need to perform complex stuffs like simulation, emulation and Artificial Intelligence, GPUs just can't do that cuz they may be fast but they're stupid due to their lack of functions(opcodes in tech terms), dumb AMD
 |
|
|
Oct 13 2011, 10:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
Multitask I guess, but 4 cores easily can handle most everyday multitask user, I tried like Hexalog(6-log) a MMORPG, Firefox, notepad and picture viewer with my 2500K and it work just fine
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 13 2011, 09:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
Yah, they be fighting with 22nm Three gate field transistor based CPU, but it also happened to be the first of its kind, problem could show up who knows
|
|
|
Oct 14 2011, 01:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
BD beat Core I7 in gaming, maybe in your dream, nothing until now have beaten Core I7 990X
|
|
|
Oct 17 2011, 10:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(yshiuan @ Oct 17 2011, 10:50 AM) seems lk a gd news. so BIOS update can solve the performance prob? No way, BIOS update won't increase performance |
|
|
Oct 20 2011, 04:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
Yeah, metal case, heat pipe cooler certain blow Intel on packaging lolz
|
|
|
Oct 24 2011, 02:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
Until software and games actually can manage to use such many thread without hassle or AMD slash great amount of the price, it(AMD FX) will like this(pics below) for now.
This post has been edited by Kizarh: Oct 24 2011, 02:41 PM Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
|
|
Oct 25 2011, 03:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(zamx @ Oct 25 2011, 02:14 PM) guys is it true amd fx 6100 is not a true 6 core compare to amd phenom II x6...and amd fx 4100 also not true quad core...? Yes, Half coresQUOTE(zenix @ Oct 25 2011, 02:31 PM) why amd fail me Cuz they don't do enough market survey and expect the Software Devs to program their software to run multithreaded(why bother change the code to multithreaded? when the CPU single Threaded performance is strong enough anyway? lolz), what a fool  |
|
|
Oct 25 2011, 04:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
797 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(zamx @ Oct 25 2011, 03:50 PM) so its better to choose phenom II X6 1090 than a amd fx 6100?is it SSE 4.1,SSE 4.2 in amd fx more benefit other phenom II?i'm in dilemma to choose...coz i have bought asus m5a97...so sad that amd fx not perform well Yes stick with phenom 2 for now, I suggest Phenom 2 X4 Black Edition 975 from lingloong(LYN garage sales), this is the second best AMD CPU for gaming, the Best is Phenom X4 Black Edition 980. |
| Change to: |  0.0765sec
 0.28
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 08:44 AM |
Quote