quite frankly if it isnt Intel do not come out the i3-2120k that priced at half of 2500K(@ Jan 2011) I would have get 2120k instead of 2500k. (Since I will be ending up using Ivy bridge, 2500K is pretty much my "temporary" CPU)

You mentioned about single core performance, but there is a huge difference between a single core and a dual core on everyday task(window environment) because you went from single to multitask, but the performance between dual and quads diminished smaller. and there are quite a number of softwares, (for me personally) only make use of dual cores and they have no plans of getting quad cores support because of the complexity involves in recoding/scheduling assignment for 4 cores. Thats the suck part unfortunately

After looking at so many 'leaked' benchmarks I would usually take it with a grain of salt, especially with Cinebench. I lost count already how many I saw a Photoshopped version.

Have the same feeling cause share system ram right?
Btw 8core series with built in graphic?

According to the pic
2.80GHz BD lose to 2.80GHz i7
This is dissapointing

But the announced stock speed should be 3.60GHz
Wanna ask
If the speed is 3.60GHz means all 8 cores run at 3.60GHz?

So that means the APU'S GPU will share the memory of the normal RAM?

woah...bd vcore already at 1.4v

To be exact, the 2600K have a max TDP of 95W while the Bulldozer core have a max TDP of 186W...

Also I do question the CPUZ also (version 1.57.1 does not mention Bulldozer support: CPUZ Version history). Also note the "Max TDP" in the CPUZ window (possible fake).

All. OS then game engine then programming language to support the multi-threading/core.