Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

115 Pages « < 74 75 76 77 78 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat

views
     
Ulysses
post Oct 27 2011, 11:39 PM

尤利西斯
*******
Senior Member
2,822 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: Georgetown, Penang



» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


yea..i still remember...i bought mine pentium dual core around 2007... it can't last long more than a hour.
xcen
post Oct 28 2011, 12:28 PM

Munch munch... Uh oh!
*******
Senior Member
2,602 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Meow...



http://www.anandtech.com/show/5026/amd-q31...ong-llano-sales

Llano sales are strong. Can they continue their success with their Piledriver platform? It remains to be seen for next year. But certainly, Q1-Q2 next year will be very interesting times for AMD indeed.
kingkingyyk
post Oct 28 2011, 02:45 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,694 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(xcen @ Oct 28 2011, 12:28 PM)
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5026/amd-q31...ong-llano-sales

Llano sales are strong. Can they continue their success with their Piledriver platform? It remains to be seen for next year. But certainly, Q1-Q2 next year will be very interesting times for AMD indeed.
*
Mostly is OEM market? biggrin.gif
najmul
post Oct 31 2011, 06:30 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
526 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


will the fm2 socket beat am3/am3+? i haven't been up to date with the news lately,is it a cpu or apu like the llano?
Thrust
post Oct 31 2011, 08:16 AM

Power To The People!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,760 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(najmul @ Oct 31 2011, 06:30 AM)
will the fm2 socket beat am3/am3+? i haven't been up to date with the news lately,is it a cpu or apu like the llano?
*
It won't beat the AM3+ socket as this socket are meant for AMD's high performance processors. Stay tune for next year of the updated Bulldozer/Piledriver that will bring performance increase (Hope without increase in power consumption as well tongue.gif)
shinjite
post Oct 31 2011, 10:16 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,320 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


No no no, the power consumption at load MUST decrease
Thrust
post Oct 31 2011, 10:20 AM

Power To The People!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,760 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(shinjite @ Oct 31 2011, 10:16 AM)
No no no, the power consumption at load MUST decrease
*
Ya, by right should decrease... tongue.gif
kingkingyyk
post Nov 1 2011, 01:55 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,694 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
http://www.inpai.com.cn/doc/hard/160517.htm

brows.gif
APU with onboard VRAM.
Looks like this is only the solution to fix the problem of memory bottleneck.
yimingwuzere
post Nov 1 2011, 05:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


http://semiaccurate.com/2011/10/27/amd-far...e-gpu-pictured/

Same image as in the above post.

Looks like a possible third generation APU to me. The article tag is a tease: HD8000.

This post has been edited by yimingwuzere: Nov 1 2011, 05:27 PM
saturn85
post Nov 2 2011, 05:00 AM

Folding@home
*******
Senior Member
8,686 posts

Joined: Mar 2009



AMD Reiterates Plans to Launch Fusion "Trinity" APU Very Early Next Year biggrin.gif

AMD's Bulldozer Beats Own Clock-Speed Record: 8.461GHz brows.gif
user posted image
shinjite
post Nov 2 2011, 09:49 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,320 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


8.461Ghz......really scalable like mad this FX
dstl1128
post Nov 2 2011, 10:23 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
With that high frequency, it probably beats its own record of power consumption too.


SUSSushiBurgerX
post Nov 2 2011, 01:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
418 posts

Joined: Aug 2010


Hmm...what i read so far, the BullDozer is a total failure....it can't even beat the Phenom X6/X4 in some test, terrible single thread performance and an multi core archicteture which is not supported by windows 7....most benchmark points to poor performance at high wattage.

AMD is in total deepshit. They haven't been able to compete with Intel since the C2D and continues that trend...seems like the only time they ever beat Intel was the Athlon era.
shinjite
post Nov 2 2011, 02:35 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,320 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


I would say all hope is not lost, at least there is a competitor to Intel smile.gif
Kizarh
post Nov 2 2011, 09:33 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
797 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(saturn85 @ Nov 2 2011, 05:00 AM)
they're using LHe cooling, I actually more interested to know how they perform in LN2 lolz

QUOTE(shinjite @ Nov 2 2011, 02:35 PM)
I would say all hope is not lost, at least there is a competitor to Intel smile.gif
*
ARM Based CPUs is much bigger treat to Intel than AMD
yimingwuzere
post Nov 2 2011, 09:58 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
990 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Bolehland


QUOTE(SushiBurgerX @ Nov 2 2011, 01:53 PM)
an multi core archicteture which is not supported by windows 7
*
The only way this can be AMD's fault is if they didn't push Microsoft to get their OS working properly for these CPUs. They fare a lot better in comparisons against Sandy Bridge on Linux.

Will agree on the other parts though, too much bloat on this processor that isn't used at all on any desktop like the extra interconnects.
RegentCid
post Nov 5 2011, 03:30 PM

グローバル防衛構想
*******
Senior Member
4,060 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: クアラルンプール > 日本


It Reach Japan

WC Version FX8150 at Japan only 500 unit.

user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

FX8150 with WC is 33,800 Yen = RM 1,344
FX8150 normal Edition still Unknow....release at Japan at Nov 11
FX8120 is 18,800 yen = RM 747
kingkingyyk
post Nov 5 2011, 04:16 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,694 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Saw Trinity engineering sample benchmark from chiphell.
3.8GHz, 4.1GHz turbo boost.
I believe it is 125W SKU.
The CPU uses Piledriver architecture.
Benchmarked in Cinebench, on par with current Llano only. doh.gif
How to compete to Ivy Bridge i3? No way.
AMD lost another card to play with.

This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Nov 5 2011, 04:17 PM
flexus90
post Nov 5 2011, 04:18 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: North Pole oF Msia


QUOTE(RegentCid @ Nov 5 2011, 03:30 PM)
It Reach Japan

WC Version FX8150 at Japan only 500 unit.

user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

FX8150 with WC is 33,800 Yen = RM 1,344
FX8150 normal Edition still Unknow....release at Japan at Nov 11
FX8120 is 18,800 yen =  RM 747
*
Is it official from AMD? Unheard this before.
lex
post Nov 5 2011, 09:07 PM

Old Am I?
Group Icon
VIP
18,182 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Dagobah
QUOTE(saturn85 @ Nov 2 2011, 05:00 AM)
This record is broken again: AnandTech > CPUs > Bulldozer Does It Again: Overclocked to 8.58GHz...
QUOTE
Bulldozer Does It Again: Overclocked to 8.58GHz

by Kristian Vättö on 11/3/2011 7:45:00 AM
Posted in CPUs, AMD, Bulldozer, FX-8150


user posted image

Last week, we reported that Andre Yang had managed to overclock AMD's FX-8150 CPU to 8.46GHz, breaking the former record set by AMD. Andre Yang has now been able to break his own record by roughly 120MHz, which is fairly notable increase given that the previous record he set was only 30MHz greater than the record before that. The new world record is 8584.8MHz to be exact, 123.3MHz greater than the previous. The record is not official yet, though, as it has not appeared in CPU-Z's validation database.

user posted image

Andre used the same Crosshair V Formula motherboard and the only difference seems to be the higher core voltage, which was 2.076V in the new record (1.992V in the old one). Andre used liquid nitrogen for cooling, so even higher overclocks could be achieved with liquid helium, which liquefies at -269 Celsius while it's -196 Celsius for nitrogen in atmosphere pressure. Bulldozer's upcoming B3 stepping could also improve the overclock-ability, possibly making 9GHz plausible.

Source: XtremeSystems


QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Nov 5 2011, 04:16 PM)
Saw Trinity engineering sample benchmark from chiphell.
3.8GHz, 4.1GHz turbo boost.
I believe it is 125W SKU.
The CPU uses Piledriver architecture.
Benchmarked in Cinebench, on par with current Llano only. doh.gif
How to compete to Ivy Bridge i3? No way.
AMD lost another card to play with.
You must be referring to this: CHIPHELL > Forum > Computer > CPU / Memory / Motherboard / Overclocking > Trinity - 3 big SB together. ...
QUOTE(bigpao007 @ Nov 4 2011, 19:39 PM)
[CPU] Trinity - 3 big SB together.

If you want to see in this the conclusion: Trinity Trinity is three big SB together.

This article is only one pair of AMD, said the anger, love the voice of DIY players.

First to a currently known about the characteristics of Trinity's architecture diagram:

user posted image
The figure is clearly expressed:

Trinity is the use of second-generation Bulldozer core and the core of NGC shows, the interface for the FM2.

CPU performance improved relative to the first generation of APU Llano up to 30%; display up to 30% performance increase.

Okay, so take a look at why I say it is 3 SB together.

First SB: interface is not compatible

Without further ado, the last picture shows the card.
user posted image

The figure above on the left of the interface of the first generation FM1 APU Llano, on the right interface for the FM2 second generation APU Trinity.

We see that different? ?

Seen it?

Out of it?

FM1 is 905 PIN, FM2 for the 904 PIN,

In fact, this is not the key to the

The following key FM1 FM2 CPU and motherboard comparison of the interface.

user posted image

Dear AMD FANS, do you think FM2 FM1 of the CPU board can be plugged into it? ?

You can plug in to it?

You can go up it?

Can it?

Second SB: Power

user posted image

FM1 is only 65/100, FM2 it? ?

More out of a 125W, but the number of cores it? ?

Only four are still the biggest heart.


According to the current first generation APU Llano performance, even if the second-generation Bulldozer core than the first generation APU Llano increased by 30% (20% of this is AMD's own targets on the slide), do you think the top of the Trinity of the CPU performance can be

SNB I3 can win it?

Could win it?

Could it?

Possible?

Timing was not released even when the face of the Trinity is IVY version of the I3, more robust performance IVY I3 of.

Third SB: Frequency

Here is the ES SAMPLE naming convention, I will focus on the ES version is released the CPU frequency.

user posted image
user posted image
user posted image

See that? Highest 3.8G, can TC to 4.1

The first generation of APU Llano frequency than TC 0.3, TC个G,


And such a high frequency, but the actual performance is almost the same and Llano (LZ tested 3D MARK V and R11.5, but I am afraid I can not release the current picture)

LZ at this time speechless.

Are there any players do not know what to say: BIOS, system drivers to improve performance ah.

I suggest that you search I found the first half of the release of the first generation of bulldozers R11.5 and 3D MARK06 CPU scores, to contrast the present and see what there is to enhance ......

As a love of DIY products and also love the players AMD CPU, AMD once again deeply hurt you.
It also seems that FM2 is not compatible with FM1. hmm.gif

QUOTE(flexus90 @ Nov 5 2011, 04:18 PM)
Is it official from AMD? Unheard this before.
That's old news, but its official and in limited quantities. wink.gif

Latest reviews: AMD FX performance in multi-GPU setups here: HARDOCP - Introduction - AMD FX-8150 Multi-GPU Gameplay Performance Review and [Madshrimps] AMD FX 8150 Revisited. icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by lex: Nov 5 2011, 09:11 PM

115 Pages « < 74 75 76 77 78 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0213sec    0.41    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 09:22 AM