looks super thin.. wonder if an occasional drop/knock would shatter/crack the mirror?
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V45!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V45!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Sep 12 2010, 11:02 PM
|
|
Elite
6,075 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 3.1553587,101.7135668 |
looks super thin.. wonder if an occasional drop/knock would shatter/crack the mirror?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2010, 11:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,065 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Bird Park Spam 2
#1 ![]() #2 ![]() #3 ![]() #4 ![]() #5 ![]() #6 ![]() #7 ![]() #8 ![]() #9 ![]() #10 ![]() |
|
|
Sep 12 2010, 11:08 PM
|
|
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
RazorVista: Make sure that you are not recomposing.
http://www.mhohner.de/recompose.php Your A700 center AF sensor is made of two cross-type sensors and one F2.8 sensor, thus made out of a total of 5 line sensors. It can detect detail to focus on in both horizontal and vertical direction. However the other sensors are line sensors which mean they can only detect detail best in one direction. If the line sensor is horizontal, you can focus on a vertical wall fine, but you might have problems using this same line sensor to focus on the edge of a horizontal table. My A700 had backfocus on the center AF point. It would happen at further distances with my Minolta 50mm F1.4. This is one of two common cases - the other is backfocus with wide-angle lenses and the 16mm end of the Zeiss 16-80mm (which miraculously focuses fine at 18mm!) evilhomura89: Thanks for finding the quote! They might be able to fix battery life, come up with some hack for RGB, and 10 FPS live feed, but the aperture being F3.5, to me, seems to be pretty much set in stone. Though I don't see why they can't keep the aperture wider while using virtual F3.5, this could be done to remove focus shift. * * focus shift is a characteristic of some bright aperture lenses, where if you've focused at F1.4, and stopped down to F8, your lens focus shifts. This happens on the Minolta 50mm F1.4 and Nikkor 50mm F1.4 AF-D, and is optically fixed on the Sigma 50mm F1.4 EX DG HSM. The Sony A230/A900 onwards seemed to have smarter firmware to compensate for this, but my A700 did not, hence I had backfocus with my Minolta 50mm F1.4. |
|
|
Sep 12 2010, 11:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,886 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BM |
@albnok
if given a chance, would you replace your a700 n use a55 as your main gear? or you would go for a580 instead? This post has been edited by evilhomura89: Sep 12 2010, 11:26 PM |
|
|
Sep 12 2010, 11:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,358 posts Joined: Feb 2006 |
@zstan & Windy87
last time i do ask in past, but not getting answer. maybe not giving example.. @albnok i tried tat time, with pop up flash and without.. both produce similar colour (violet blue) for the flower as well instead of purple |
|
|
Sep 12 2010, 11:34 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
163 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: Pearl Of The Orient |
QUOTE(albnok @ Sep 12 2010, 10:38 PM) Windy87: The most practical solution is to use a flash. thanks for the tutorial..To make colors vibrant, simply set your Creative Style to Vivid and adjust contrast and saturation as you like. I like Vivid +1 +2 +3. I've reworked your shot a bit, making masks for both the face and tie (hint: you can use a color channel as a mask; it's a lot faster than painting it in): » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « ahpingko: Didn't go to SRJK© mah. zstan: Firstly, your WB is a bit off - a bit cold. After fixing that, I pulled up the reds that were 'hiding' behind the very strong blues. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « I've written a tutorial here to recover colors, which I used for both your picture and Windy87's: http://www.glaringnotebook.com/default.asp?id=1313 nicely writen. now over-blown pictures can be save.. hahhaa.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2010, 11:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
@albnok
thanks for the correction! so its just WB problem eh. got a shock when i saw the different colours. hmm...the translucent mirror does indeed seem fragile~ one of my fav: ![]() |
|
|
Sep 12 2010, 11:48 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,633 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: www.kelvinchiew.com |
zstan, nice I like this shot, but erm the black wire on the floor bottom right very distracting and illusion looks like she is holding it.... using tamron on this??? quite sharp worr
|
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
QUOTE(porkchop @ Sep 12 2010, 11:48 PM) zstan, nice I like this shot, but erm the black wire on the floor bottom right very distracting and illusion looks like she is holding it.... using tamron on this??? quite sharp worr haha. thanks. can't do anything about the wire though. its fixed. =/yeapz tamron! shot at f2.8 and iso 100 and 1/320 speed plus direct flash. |
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:08 AM
|
|
Elite
4,956 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
fansoption: Nice #2 though remove the tilt. Get #3 framed so that you can see what it is looking down at.
evilhomura89: I sold my A100 to get the A700, and sold my A700 to get the A900. Nope, I am not considering the A580 at all. If I knew about the A55 I might not have gotten the NEX-5. I have a Cybershot WX-1 for pocketability (but the color isn't quite like the NEX!) I like having both FF and APS-C for reach and composition. 24mm on the A900 is a group shot wide-angle lens which also does close range well (because it is wide enough.) 24mm on the A55 is a 'regular' angle like your phone camera. The other benefit is that it is very versatile - if I wanted to take a shot of 4 people in a small room, I could still do it without switching lenses. At the same time, it is narrow enough to be able to frame one subject (plus, the Zeiss 24mm F2.0 goes much closer, like a digicam's macro!) 85mm on the A900 is superb for a shot of 2 people from a slight distance, while looking portrait-ish. It is also superb for getting a portrait of a person from head to waist. 85mm on the A55 is tight, but it picks out one person in a telephoto way. It is also perfect for stages. With this combo, I can be shooting tele, and quickly switch to wide when needed. e-jump is having this perfect prime combo (28mm F1.8 + 85mm F1.4.) hiansitt: Hmmm I have posted the link before (probably a few threads back hehe.) zstan: Eh! I saw a bunch of photographers at Garden, The Curve! I didn't spot any Sony neckstraps though. |
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
|
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:15 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,373 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Melaka/Shah Alam |
goin for kampung photoshoot tmr wif my model...any advice?
|
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,886 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
QUOTE(d4rkholeang3l @ Sep 13 2010, 12:15 AM) day shot? try to use flash if possible...or reflector would be better... my today's photoshoot those photogs tot they could do wonders with just a 50mm lens alone when they are shooting a subject against a very bright background light. end up most who did not use flash had underexposed pictures. |
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:21 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,373 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Melaka/Shah Alam |
haha...i tengah baca sejarah ni...it's morning shot...7am...
my 50mm is attached to my a230 when i send it for service.. haiz.. dattime i din bring body cap.bo pian lo... tmr need to rely on 28mm and 75-300 |
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:22 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
|
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,373 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Melaka/Shah Alam |
wow...i always see ppl bounce from upwards, but u bounce from downwards..haha.. new style..
but it creates shadow la... |
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:25 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
15,856 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Zion |
purposely wan create the shadow one ma..
got a bit mysterious/dramatic feel.. |
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,373 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Melaka/Shah Alam |
not to mention, the eyes macam abit soft..got OOF ?
in fact, the whole picture looks soft..or maybe it's me after reading too much sejarah? |
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 12:27 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,053 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Kuching |
albnok: i see... so you'd place the a55 over the NEX... but of course im not THAT surprise... i would to if i didnt need the pocketability factor.
zstan: how come macam soft? rayng: make sure take some 'sexy' shots! |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0182sec
0.58
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 10:22 PM |