Mar 26 2011, 11:00 AM
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Mar 11 2011, 10:40 AM)
Wanna add my 2cents onto this.
- There isn't really any real difference in image quality between the enthuasiast compact crowd. I mean.. the difference is sooooooooo small that one will have to scrutinize really deeply to see any minute difference even in a perfect scenario. In actual use, I would say its zero
- Interface wise, S95 better especially with the dual control ring and set button to bring up the quick menu. LX5 distinct tiny d-pad buttons are not so friendly for man-sized fingers.
- Size wise... its up to preference.
- Speed wise.. S95 faster to operate.
- LX5 advantage is its faster lens fully zoomed out and its wider 24mm end.
how about compare with Olympus xz 1- There isn't really any real difference in image quality between the enthuasiast compact crowd. I mean.. the difference is sooooooooo small that one will have to scrutinize really deeply to see any minute difference even in a perfect scenario. In actual use, I would say its zero
- Interface wise, S95 better especially with the dual control ring and set button to bring up the quick menu. LX5 distinct tiny d-pad buttons are not so friendly for man-sized fingers.
- Size wise... its up to preference.
- Speed wise.. S95 faster to operate.
- LX5 advantage is its faster lens fully zoomed out and its wider 24mm end.
Quote
0.0160sec
0.71
7 queries
GZIP Disabled