
Buy Club V2, Show off what you bought today!!!
Buy Club V2, Show off what you bought today!!!
|
|
Aug 25 2010, 10:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
Bought this last week at YL camera
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 13 2010, 11:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2010, 01:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Nov 11 2010, 01:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(ComradeZ @ Nov 11 2010, 01:47 PM) warghhhh !!! another 1 more d700 user.... is it really cheap compared to last price? I mean how cheap is it? say by 400? The D700 used to cost around 8000 something when it was launched, , even few months ago the prices were quite near to 7000. Now it's only available for around 6~6.1k |
|
|
Nov 14 2010, 10:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Nov 14 2010, 10:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 22 2010, 03:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Nov 23 2010, 11:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(fatani @ Nov 23 2010, 01:39 AM) i still think that the 70-300vr is also an elongated kit lens too. U probably need to test more, try checking out the ugly bokeh of 55-300 first before u say so i tried both the 55-300VR and 70-300VR on a DX body. in terms of pic quality, i think both are on par. the only major diff(the deciding factors) were focus speed(which i think 70-300 is faster, but in terms of focus speed in general, the 55-300,yes slower than the 70-300vr,but isnt that too slow either. i still can shoot birds with it) and the cam body(dx only and dx,FF). and the price too. well, both are no winner in low light. |
|
|
Nov 23 2010, 07:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(fatani @ Nov 23 2010, 12:31 PM) well, u get what u pay for. cant expect miracles. If the photos i saw from your fb are indication of the quality, i would say the 55-300 is way softer than the 70-300vr i found the bokeh is still acceptable. example at 300mm. ![]() or u may check my FB..my straight on experience with the 55-300VR.no third party internet reviews. just wanna share. http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=119...100001584613502 or the whole album here http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=119...100001584613502 not saying that its superior than 70-300VR(1.8k-2.2k,depend on places), but for the price(1.15k-1.3k), it's very very acceptable and the IQ wasnt too far off, if not as good. anyway, i think we are way off topic. this is the show off your new gadgets thread. hehehe..taaa.. |
|
|
Nov 28 2010, 07:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Nov 28 2010, 08:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Dec 9 2010, 10:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2010, 09:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 31 2010, 07:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Jan 7 2011, 01:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Jan 20 2011, 08:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 19 2011, 04:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(ReeNz @ Feb 19 2011, 04:08 PM) Post some user review Anyway here's my haul for today, been 3months since my last lens purchase and it's feeling like eternity ![]() Nikkor 16-35 F/4 VR by Bliz®, on Flickr This post has been edited by Bliz: Feb 19 2011, 05:27 PM |
|
|
Feb 19 2011, 05:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 19 2011, 10:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 20 2011, 09:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(skycrawler @ Feb 20 2011, 11:07 AM) Superb in everywhere, AF speed might not be as fast as the 24-70 or 70-200 but not really bothers me till i scream slowwwwwwww.. it's quite fast and silent, not to mention the VR is totally awesome, good lens for travel photography + food photos |
| Change to: | 0.1005sec
1.11
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 01:23 AM |