One player that would really complete the team. Schweinsteiger, damn i want him soooo bad.
English Clubs Manchester United Street Talks, 29/08 Man Utd v West Ham | 00:30 CH817
English Clubs Manchester United Street Talks, 29/08 Man Utd v West Ham | 00:30 CH817
|
|
Aug 10 2010, 09:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
431 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
One player that would really complete the team. Schweinsteiger, damn i want him soooo bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2010, 10:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
431 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
Schweinsteiger is almost the finished product, his runs, stamina, work ethic, passing and he can score, he's the new ballack! Perhaps better!
|
|
|
Aug 10 2010, 11:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
431 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(Wan @ Aug 10 2010, 11:11 PM) He would be a very good signing considering his fee and what he can do right now and potentially in the future. But he's no Scholes. Different sort of players. Scholes plays in the middle from deep. Ozil is the opposite influencing the plays in advance position. We often play with two strikers and we already have the likes of Nani and Valencia out wide. Not sure he's good enough to play in the middle against the better sides(talking about CM position here). There was one commentary that he was giggs+keane in 1. If he's even as good as keane or giggs, definitely worth 30+m pounds for him.(http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/jul/04/bastian-schwiensteiger-maradona-germany-argentina)Would be a very high price to get him. And Bayern won't let him go easily. If he moves, it would be to Spain, or City's $$$. This post has been edited by Tak3shi: Aug 10 2010, 11:19 PM |
|
|
Aug 12 2010, 08:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
431 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(alien2003 @ Aug 12 2010, 12:14 AM) This is ridiculous. Enough is enough. Just because you are not interested in certain discussion topics brought up by others, it gives you the right to call it as muppetry or bullcrap? Thumbs up. Class prevails over a superficial tag.I am sorry but what sort of nonsense is this? First of all, this is a DISCUSSION thread which means it covers from tabloid rumours to certified, confirmed news. I don't see what's the problem of discussing transfers rumours. If that's not something you interested in then fine with it. You can just remain as reader and don't need to respond with posts like muppets or other words to attack others sarscatically. Secondly, being a so called senior LYN members DO NOT give you any right at all to make fun of others without knowing the limit. Calling people muppet certainly is OVER the limit. I can't remember starting from when but some of the member's posting behavior has certainly become rather aggresive/abusive and that trend need to stop. All the rules & regulations are there for all to see and read. So I will not hesitate to do my job as a moderator and report any posts that overstep the line (as I had done in the past) and I mean it. So please do not take things for granted. Some of you might not like the rules but its there for a reason and one of it is to prevent these kind of thing happening. This post has been edited by Tak3shi: Aug 12 2010, 08:07 AM |
|
|
Aug 16 2010, 01:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
431 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(alien2003 @ Aug 12 2010, 10:47 AM) Well, if that's your own view I have no problem with it. I have stated countless times that Lowyat.Net is a multipurpose forums unlike redcafe or some other more sports oriented based websites The thing here is people fail to realize that reigning over what is acceptable and not acceptable on a public forum isn't a walk in the park. With everyone having their own different opinions there are bound to arguments abounding.Hence the running of the forum will have to be different. Its not like LYN just been set up few months. Its already there for a long time together with all the rules & regulations. I never say no banters but calling other muppets is NOT considered as one, air_mood. You can always make jokes with your friend but there is a limit on it. You can't make jokes by using abusive words towards your friend's family members, that's just wrong. People will be whatever they are, fickle fans or not as football is a such a fickle sport, you're happy 1 min into the game, absolutely appalled the next minute. If enforcement could big brother everyone, kopitiam wouldn't be the state it is now. Besides sometimes it's cool to just go with the flow and not get uptight over everything. We are responsible for the way we carry ourselves and we can never fully reign over how another expresses himself unless we show exemplary conduct in which might convince others enough to do the same. |
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 02:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
431 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(boxsystem @ Aug 18 2010, 08:29 AM) HAHAHAHAHAHA. Can you just take a chill pill and not big brother everyone...Again, HAHAHAHAHA. FUUUUU!! No dreadlocks? Alamakkkkkkkk. Carrick past his best? HAHAHAHAAHAHA. Kiko is a prima donna? HAHAHAAHHA. Seriously, the amount of dunno-what-LOL in this thread has become ridiculous. We have haobeck saying that Nani and Valencia are shit. Then, we have jhchong saying Carrick has past it and last but not least gizmoduck saying that Kiko is a prima donna. It is really hard to resist posting in here due to the amount of dunno-what-LOL. What the hell is this? The season barely starts and we have people complaining already? As far as I remember we have just won with 3 goals each in both Community Shield and the first match of the season with Newcastle. Nani and Valencia was instrumental in CS and Newcastle matches respectively. They played well actually. Besides the season just started, doesn't it? That answers your statement haobeck. Bebe hasn't played yet and you've judged him numblink? Well, if your judgement based on Youtube, even Gallas looks tremendous! In reality, he is shite and gay. While Carrick was immense in CS and rested in first match of PL to give way to Fletcher. The reason that his contributions go unnoticed due to Scholesy's domination in that match. Personally, (and I can find people agreeing with me) Carrick was great in that match. He killed of most of the attacks from Chelsea. And that's for you jhchong. So, how do you rate him? Based on what? Oh .. gizmoduck, SAF did mentioned that Macheda is an arrogant person but he didn't mean that he is a prima donna as you called. Besides, SAF has mentioned this attribute is important for a player in developing his game play. I have seen you argued around with air_mood and played around with English language. I am not sure whether you're an English teacher or what, but you have got to learn to read between the lines. That is your problem, really. Example, Ronaldo is an arrogant person, isn't he? So he is a prima donna, isn't he? Based on on-field antics, I would rather say that Berbatov is truly a prima donna although from his interviews and all, suggest otherwise. Last but not least, thank you Mesut Ozil for choosing RM. Again, Manchester United has just been SNUBBED! Oh and if Manchester United is being managed by FM muppets(I should have used dunno-what-LOL) like most of the posters here, I would think that United would have been relegated a long long time ago. If you don't like what you see don't come in to the thread, no point getting annoyed over views you can't agree on. Added on August 18, 2010, 2:23 pm QUOTE(rayz1031 @ Aug 18 2010, 11:25 AM) Bebe cut off his Bob Marley look, if he would keep that, I will change my avatar for that. He reminds me of young Hendrik Larsson, the floor mop hair is awesome and very useful when contending crosses..but now, he looks like Frankenstein This post has been edited by Tak3shi: Aug 18 2010, 02:23 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 02:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
431 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(Wan @ Aug 17 2010, 11:28 PM) We play Actually he can fit in 442 if there is a holding midfielder, he can roam and support the attack where he sees fit, it's just that fletcher seems to be be more box to box as opposed to holding, we don't really have any dm's who sits in front of defense for an AM to run around.442: he won't fit in, unless he plays out wide. 433/451(3 CMs alongside each other): out wide for him since the midfielders job would be to go up and down a lot. 4231: AM.. behind a Rooney, definitely would fit in. 3/5 of our games we play with two strikers. And we have plenty of very good options out wide and upfront to sacrifice. Ozil can't play in the middle of midfield in 442. His game is about freedom, and playing in the middle having to both defend and attack would restrict him and make him less effective. He is best suited to playing just ahead of the midfield, doing whatever he likes and sees fit. He would be pretty effective in a 4231 playing behind Rooney though.. but we only play it a few times all season long. |
|
|
Aug 18 2010, 02:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
431 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(mhyug @ Aug 17 2010, 10:08 PM) yezzzaaaaaaaa finally were free from this rumour!expect the usual snub of the snubbed making rounds soon~~~ TBH, i don't know how RM is going to play so many players. They'll probably end up like robben and sneidjer... Not enough play time in RM and fantastic elsewhere..hahahahaha i gelak guling2 la kat whomm ever still at rm.now lets see whos gonna be getting the paycheck for being real madrids heater~~ Ahhh robben he snubbed us for chelsea. |
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 02:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
431 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(Wan @ Aug 18 2010, 11:33 PM) Maybe, maybe not. Don't think he's ever played there. Last season AM, before that on the wings. Could do a Schweinsteiger who was a winger in his younger days until last season where he turned into a full time CM, but he has a high work rate. Ozil seems like those classy modern attacker who doesn't do a lot of defending. AM-DM is a fantasy. Could work in some games, the easy ones, but then even the easy ones nowadays is hard with them flooding the middle. Could work if that AM is disciplined/work hard playing in that role but we wouldn't really call that an AM. One distributor, another one box to box. It's like PJS role, when he comes on he's given the license to run and roam. If he's intelligent, fast and technically good he can easily draw 2 players to himself which would go some way to prying up the defense. And counter attacks if we can hit them fast without giving the ball away.This post has been edited by Tak3shi: Aug 19 2010, 02:35 PM |
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 02:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
431 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(+Newbie+ @ Aug 19 2010, 01:57 PM) It would be interesting. But ... i would shit in my pants if that were to happen ... I can't remember the names but there were a bunch of guys here who said ohhhh let's face Barca in Finals. I was like noooooooooooo. No offense but they are untouchable, too much quality, too cohesive. It'll take a real off day for us to beat them unless our players improve by miles.Not necessarily. Take a look at Chelsea and their diamond. Usually the person playing the bottom of the diamond (Essien or Mikel) will sit back and protect the back 4 most of the time. Yeah, Carrick and Scholes, although Scholes might not be able to maintain that in whole games. and then there's Fletcher too. You're just worried that Zamora scores this weekend while Chicharito doesn't. When u want to play Barca you can't waste even a chance because u know u won't be having much of the ball. And you need good ball winners to stifle their game. |
|
|
Aug 19 2010, 03:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
431 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0582sec
0.32
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 11:55 PM |